“gracious gifts”

president-abraham-lincoln-6 (http://ushistoryimages.com/images/president-abraham-lincoln/fullsize/president-abraham-lincoln-6.jpg)

predicts a ” large increase of freedom”

150 years ago today President Lincoln proclaimed another day of thanksgiving for 1863.

From The Papers And Writings Of Abraham Lincoln, Volume Six:

PROCLAMATION FOR THANKSGIVING, OCTOBER 3, 1863.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AMERICA:

A Proclamation.

The year that is drawing towards its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added which are of so extraordinary a nature that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever-watchful providence of Almighty God. In the midst of a civil war of unequalled magnitude and severity which has sometimes seemed to invite and provoke the aggressions of foreign states; peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union. The needful diversion of wealth and strength from the fields of peaceful industry, to the national defense has not arrested the plough, the shuttle, or the ship: The axe has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of, iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege, and the battle-field; and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect a continuance of years, with large increase of freedom.

No human counsel hath devised, nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.

It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be reverently, solemnly, and gratefully acknowledged, as with one heart and voice, by the whole American people. I do, therefore, invite my fellow-citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea, and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a day of thanksgiving and prayer to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that, while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners, or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty hand to heal the wounds of the nation, and to restore it, as soon as may be consistent with divine purposes, to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquillity, and union.

In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the city of Washington, this third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-eighth.

A. LINCOLN.

By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD,
Secretary of State

On the same day that President Lincoln said that the diversion of resources from peaceful industry “to the national defense has not arrested the plough, the shuttle, or the ship”, a Richmond newspaper pointed out that down South there did not seem to be enough resources to go around. If old men and boys are forced to serve in the military, how can necessary farming and manufacturing continue?

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch October 3, 1863:

[Antietam, Md. Confederate dead by a fence on the Hagerstown road (by Alexander gardner, 1862 September; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpb-01097)

clothing auctions dreaded as much as battle

Prices of clothing and produce.

-The rapid advance in all necessaries of clothing and subsistence threatens us with great distress. There is no disguising the fact. We cannot see how unemployed persons, and how those who live on incomes and salaries, are to get along, especially at the inclement season of the year now rapidly approaching. How are they to buy shoes and clothing at present rates? Nay, how long are these rates to prevail? A great auction may in a day or two run them all up 50 per cent.! An auction thus has become to be regarded by the people with as much dread as a battle! A defeat on the battle field could hardly bring more suffering upon them. There is hardly any more encouragement to be derived from looking at the produce market. With ample supplies by the blessing of Providence, through the country, we find the receipts in this market alarmingly limited. Holders are therefore enabled to run up prices out of all reason and out of all conscience. These obstacles to oppression of a community weighing nothing with them since they care nothing for reasons and have no consciences.

We know that the currency is depreciated, but it is not depreciated as much as prices would indicate. There are causes originating in the cupidity and heartlessness of men employed in commerce and in agriculture which are weighing down the people and the cause, and which are threatening both more than the currency. Can the practices of these people be reformed? Can the distress they occasion be moderated by checking their extravagant demands upon consumers? These questions are growing daily more and more important. Something must be done. Produce must be distributed — prices must be reduced — gains must be disgorged — or there will be suffering intense, and intense suffering will beget — what? Think of it.

The necessity of Production.

–The high prices of every article of food and clothing, with a constant tendency upward, indicates to us the greatest danger of the Confederacy at the present moment. There are many sacrifices which men can make, and which a great majority of the people of this country have made, for the defence of their liberties. They can dispense with the luxuries and superfluities of life — they can give life itself for the cause of independence — but while life remains there are certain essentials which it can only surrender at the cost of extermination. In the first place the army itself must be supplied with bread and clothing, and if there were no other mouths in the country to feed, none others to be kept from nakedness, the supply of this portion of the population alone would require that the producing power of the country be carefully husbanded, and its industrial capacities developed, instead of diminished. But, besides the army, there are millions of women and children whose wants must be provided for, and who are in serious danger of suffering if the regular operations of the fields and workshops are interrupted by calling off old men and youths — incapable at best of efficient military service — from duties which they are capable of performing, and which are as essential to the welfare of the country and the success of military operations as the use of the musket and the cannon by those in the field.

Already we are beginning to feel the want of labor in those mechanical and manufacturing employments which are indispensable not only to comfort, but to existence. Every day lost by the withdrawal of operatives from factories involves a deficiency of a vast amount of fabrics necessary to the use and comfort of man, and for the supply of which we can no longer look to foreign countries. What are the people to do this winter for clothing, food, fuel, and other articles of prime necessity, if, in addition to the sufferings resulting from extortion, the few producers who are left be turned into consumers, thereby diminishing the scanty means of supply and increasing a demand which already taxes to the utmost our labor and industrial skill? We have already in the field an army large enough and brave enough to encounter and defeat our foes, and, if the present laws of Congress be faithfully executed, we do not require another man. The Northern draft is now admitted to be a failure, and our most pressing danger is the immense privation and suffering which our own people must endure if the producing power of the country be any further diminished.

This subject deserves the serious consideration of our public men. Organizations for home defence are one thing, and an important thing, but a levy, en masse of the population is at this time about as suicidal a piece of policy as the Yankees themselves could desire us to perpetrate. In noting down an amendment to the militia bill which proposed to require the same service from legislators that they demand from boys of sixteen and old men of fifty-five, legislators here expressed the opinion that there ought to be some exemptions from the service they require, and they will pardon a suffering community for believing that there are other classes — agriculturists, manufacturers, and artisans — whose producing capacity is quite as important to the general welfare as the exemption from draft of the members of the General Assembly.

Patriotism among the farmers.

–Messrs. Smith and Wigfall are doing much service in their public appeals in behalf of the cause and their arguments for the reduction of prices and the liberal distribution of the necessaries of life. Five of the largest counties in the State have in public meeting of their citizens adopted resolutions honorable to their humanity and their patriotism. Their examples should be followed universally. Old Augusta especially takes strong ground. The citizens taking part in the meeting resolved to pay in their tenthto the Government and to sell their surplus produce at the prices fixed by the Government assessors; and they further resolved to report all farmers who refused to do this to the Government officers, in order that their surplus might be impressed. Albemarle, Buckingham, Louisa, Augusta and Monroe lead the way in these honorable resolutions. If some other counties which send their produce to this city would imitate their example, the prospect here would wear a more cheerfully.

Augusta County, Virginia countryside, view from Parnassus, 2007

Old Augusta vows to pay its tenth, sell surplus at government prices, and tell on the non-compliant (photo c.2007)

The photo of Augusta County, Virginia by Hamiltonl at en.wikipedia is licensed by Creative Commons

U.S. History Images provides the Lincoln image.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Lincoln Administration, Northern Society, Southern Society | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

rebel wordplay

Crawfish_BW

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch October 2, 1863:

Chickamauga, or the river of Death.

In the spring of 1858, while seeking the benefit of a change of climate and relaxation from laborious duties, I met the late Colonel Whiteside at Chattanooga. Among the many interesting traditions associated with various localities in this beautiful region of country he related one in explanation of the meaning of the word “Chickamauga,” and how it came to be applied to the two small streams which bear this name. A tribe of Cherokees occupied this region, and when the small-pox was first communicated to the Indians of this continent it appeared in this tribe, and made frightful havoc among them. It was the custom of the Indians, at the height of this disease, to go, by scores, and jump into the river to allay the tormenting symptoms. This, of course, increased the mortality, and the name “Chickamauga.” or “River of Death” was applied to the two streams, which they have borne ever since. The remnant of the tribe was also afterwards called the “Chickamauga tribe.” We hope Gen Bragg will call his great victory the Battle of Chickamauga, and not “Peavine Creek” or “Crawfish Springs,” as is suggested in Rosecrans’s dispatch. He has certainly crawfished out of Georgia; but we prefer “Chickamauga,” or the “River of Death.”

“River of Death” and its association with the Cherokees’ contact with Europeans’ small pox is one possible meaning of Chickamauga. The verb crawfish can mean “to back out of a commitment or retreat from a position”

The image is from wpclipart

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Military Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

sans ticker tape

russian-fleet-1500 (Harper's Weekly, 10-17-1863)

Russian fleet in New York harbor

Ships from the Russian fleet had been anchored in New York harbor for over a week (and although the ships enjoyed visitors, a “furore” was created when Mrs. Lincoln prematurely visited one of the ships). 150 years ago today a grand celebration was held in New York City, including a reception aboard the Russian flagship, receptions in New York, and a grand parade.

From The New-York Times October 2 1863:

OUR RUSSIAN GUESTS.; Their Magnificent Reception Yesterday. Imposing Popular Ovation and Brilliant Military Pageant. The Cross of St. Andrew and the Stars and Stripes Blending Amicably. Formal Greeting by Mayor Opdyke, and Grand Review in the Park. A Procession, Presentation and Royal Salutes. THE STRANGERS GREATLY DELIGHTED.

Yesterday was a memorable one in the history of the City, as having been set apart for the formal reception of the Russian Admiral LISOVSKY and the Officers of his Fleet, and as being the occasion of welcome exceeding in warmth and earnestness any that busy and big-hearted New-York has extended. The day was beautiful, and the feeling of the people hospitable and exuberant. There was evidently a desire among all to extend to out distinguished guests an unmistakably hearty and cordial welcome. The desire was more than fulfilled, for, from the lancing of the Officers until their departure from the City Hall, the ovation was one of the most brilliant, hearty and gratifying character. Of course, it was not to the individuals so much as to the Sovereign and People of the great empire they represented, whose consistent and sincere friendship has been appreciated by the public heart. There was l[e]ss of the noisy, boisterous welcome and enthusiasm that has characterized many receptions, but there was much more of the really sincere expression of feelings, which, while somewhat less demonstrative, is [???] as effective [???]. …

Punch 10-24-1863

similar insurrection problems

ROYAL SALUTE.

The Bay of New-York has witnessed a great many salutes in times past, but never until yesterday did it comprehend the meaning of a Russian royal salute. It was a roaring, thundering, earthshaking demonstration, emblematic of the outspoken voice of Imperial Russia. After the first gun, those of the Committee who were inclined to smile at the Admiral’s apprehensions of accident from the salute felt the propriety of his caution. … [parade, receptions, and warm comments by New Yorkers and Russians]

h1863p672_Picture1(Harper's Weekly, 10-17-1863)


THE PERPLEXED PIRATES.
Louis NAPOLEON (a Corsair). “Veil, Meestare Jonnibull! vat you see zat time you peep round ze cornare fro your beeg glass?”
JOHN BULL (Another). “I see a werry suspicious looking cove a sittin’ in the New York ‘arbor, with arf-a-dozen big Rooshian blood-hounds about him.”
LOUIS NAPOLEON. “Hein?”
JOHN BULL. “Humph!’

There were many similar instances of mutual good will existing between our people and these sons of a empire, now overshadowing both Europe and the East, and no longer very distant from us, since we have planted our standards so far northward in the direction of Behring’s Straits. The flag to-day seen in our harbor floating above those castles of the deep that fortify the mandates of the Czar, is growing as familiar to the eyes of our brethren on the Pacific as the standards of France and England have been to us on the Atlantic, and the [???]gs it will bring to them and us may take its keynote for a generation to come from the echoes of this grand reception of the Muscovite squadron in the Bay of New-York! …

You can read an overview of the reasons and effects of the Russian fleet’s visit to New York and San Francisco at Loyola University New Orleans. Apparently the visit helped Union morale as the positive feelings after Gettysburg and Vicksburg began to wane and French and British continued a policy of neutrality: “Oliver Wendell Holmes, referring to Alexander sending the Russian fleet to America, said he was ‘our friend when the world was our foe.'”

The October 17, 1863 issue of Harper’s Weekly (at Son of the South) provided a lot of coverage of the Russian visit. All of the images are from that newspaper except for the cartoon of Abe and Ales from the October 24, 1863 issue of Punch

broadway-parade (Harper's Weekly, 10-17-1863)


THE GRAND PROCESSION OF OUR RUSSIAN VISITORS THROUGH BROADWAY, UNDER ESCORT OF THE MILITIA AND POLICE.

And I wanted to mention that according to Wikipedia New York City’s first ticker tape parade occurred as part of “a spontaneous celebration held on October 28, 1886 during the dedication of the Statue of Liberty”

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Foreign Relations, Northern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

new ironsides

Benjamin H. Porter (New York State Military Museum.)

Benjamin H. Porter (New York State Military Museum.)

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in September 1863:

ENSIGN BENJ. F. PORTER, of the New Ironsides, a young and promising officer, about whose daring courage so much has recently been told, has his home at Skaneateles.

It seems that Benjamin Franklin was a popular given name in the 19th century (for example, see B.F. Butler), but in this case the young officer was almost certainly Benjamin H. Porter, who graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 1862 or 1863. The incident of daring courage probably took place on the night of August 20-21, 1863 when the USS New Ironsides was the target of a torpedo boat attach in Charleston harbor. According to USS New Ironsides in the Civil War,[1]Ensign Porter repeatedly hailed the torpedo boat as it approached. The torpedo never made contact and the New Ironsides escaped without damage.

There is evidence that at some point Porter was captured during the relentless, if unsuccessful, Union effort to capture Fort Sumter and Charleston. I don’t know when, so far.

Ensign Porter was mentioned in press reports of September 1863. Southerners noted the following incident as an example of Yankee overconfidence because “care packages” were addressed to him and a comrade at Fort Sumter. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch September 15, 1863:

Charleston harbor September 1863

New Ironsides mapped in main Ship Channel

Affairs at Charleston.

The Charleston Mercury, of Friday, says that the enemy has refrained from firing since his unsuccessful assault on Fort Sumter. Our batteries on James and Sullivan’s Islands, together with Fort Moultrie, keep up a steady fire on the Morris Island works. It adds:

The enemy is reported busy at work on batteries Gregg and Wagner, having erected a large platform for his guns on the latter, and thrown up an extensive sand embankment on the former. The Yankees are also said to be working on their batteries on Craig’s Hill and building embrasures for guns pointing to Sullivan’s Island, which it is believed will be the next point of attack.

The Ironsides was lying in her old position yesterday, opposite battery Wagner, receiving ammunition from a schooner alongside of her. The monitors remain at their old anchorage. One of the enemy’s steamers appeared busy yesterday transporting guns and ordnance. …

They admit that the fire from Sullivan’s Island in the last fight was very accurate, one of the monitors having been struck on the turret twenty-nine times, without, they say, doing any damage. One monitor had her smoke stack blown off entirely. The Ironsides was struck fifty times without, they say, inflicting any serious damage. The prisoners manifest a great deal of confidence in the ability of General Gill more to take the city.

So confident were they of success in the late expedition that two boxes were received under flag of truce, one addressed to “Lieut. E. P. Williams, commanding Fort Sumter,” and another to “Ensign Benjamin H. Porter, Fort Sumter.” They were packed with lemons, jellies, liquors, &c., evidently prepared for a general glorification.

The Benjamin Porter House is a Bed & Breakfast in Skaneateles, New York. The house belonged to Benjamin H. Porter’s uncle. The current owners named it in honor of the Porters and their own son, a graduate of the Naval Academy in 2002.

Hant-tinted copy of a line engraving by Smyth, depicting USS New Ironsides and two monitors in action at Charleston, South Carolina, circa 1863.  Courtesy of the Navy Art Collection, Washington, D.C.

“The Iron-Clad Frigate New Ironsides and Two Ericsson Batteries going into action at Charleston”

  1. [1]Roberts, William H. USS New Ironsides in the Civil War. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1999. Print. page 76.
Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Naval Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

beef prices

It’s been almost six months since the Richmond Bread Riot, but scarcity and inflation are still making life difficult in Richmond. Here a group of butchers are willing to comply with a government request that they regulate their beef prices as long as 1) the government does not impress cattle that are being transported to the Richmond market 2) that they can pay their suppliers a price above the government price to make sure the suppliers still bring it to them 3) that the government get other business people to lower their prices a similar amount – otherwise the butchers’ expenses will stay at a high price.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch September 28, 1863:

Regulating the prices.–Commendable move on the part of the Butcheries.

–We mentioned some days since that a move was on foot in this city to bring down the prices, and fix some standard governing the sale of all articles of provisions. Since that time we have ascertained that such is the fact, and, as a preliminary step, a meeting of all the butchers took place one day last week in compliance with a request from Major Wm. H. Smith, to arrange some plan for the purchase of cattle. At that meeting a committee was appointed to consider the matter, which committee met on Fridayevening last and drew up the following propositions. which have been submitted to the Government authorities:

“Major W. H. Smith–Sir: We, the undersigned butchers, having met together at your request to fix a standard price for purchasing cattle to be slaughtered for the inhabitants of this city, so as not to conflict with purchasers for the Government, and also to reduce the price of beef from our stalls, respectfully submit the following propositions;

“1. That all cattle on route to this market for sale on arrival shall not be impressed or interfered with by the Government.
“2. That it is quite inconvenient at times for us to leave our stalls to lay in our supplies, or to get suitable agents to do the same satisfactorily, and that the owners of stock may be permitted to bring it here, by allowing a price above the Government price sufficient to cover all risk — driftage and expense.
“3. That our profit will be principally regulated by the value of the fifth quarter, and the quality of the cattle must regulate the price thereof; we, therefore, request that we may pay in this market from 20 to 35 cents gross for fair to extra cattle, and that we retail the same from our stalls from 50 to 75 cents net by retail, which will be a reduction of about one-half from present rates.
“4. From the above propositions it will be seen that the farmer and butcher have reduced the present prices one half, while their expenses in all articles necessary and indispensable are still at inflated prices, with an upward tendency; and if everything useful for the support of the needy were likewise reduced 50 per cent, the evil which is sought to be remedied would in a great measure be averted.
“5. We earnestly hope, should the above liberal propositions be accepted, that you use all proper means to have all other necessaries of life reduced in a like ratio. Should the above result be not enforced, the above obligations to be null and void after 1st of November.next.
“6. The above resolutions to be put in force from and after the 10th of October. next.”

Richmond, Sept. 25, 1863.

It is also reported that robberies appear to be increasing. From the same issue

Robbery of a Church.

–Robberies in this city are becoming very frequent, and the operators seem to be indifferent as to where they make their raids. On Friday night last the Monumental Church was forcibly entered and robbed of one superior black silk gown, nearly new; one black silk scarf, belonging to the surplice; two table cloths, six damask napkins, two small napkins, and four damask towels

Richmond, Va. Monumental Church (LC-DIG-cwpb-02906)

Monumental Church in 1865

Richmond’s Monumental Church was constructed in 1814 as “a memorial to the 72 individuals that died in the Richmond Theater Fire of 1811.” Robert Mills, the architect, “was the only architectural pupil of Thomas Jefferson”.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

fact check

150 years ago this month The Old Guard published the following:

Old Guard on Daniel Webster (September 1863)

prophecy from the grave?

William H. Seward delivered his “irrepressible conflict” speech in 1858. Daniel Webster died in 1852.

Abolitionists felt betrayed by Webster’s support of the Compromise of 1850 and its Fugitive Slave Law.

Daniel Webster, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly right (between 1845 and 1849; LOC: LC-USZ62-110179)

“the expounder of the constitution”

Daniel Webster addressing the United States Senate, in the great debate of the Constitution and the Union 1850 (c1860; LOC: LC-USZ62-1414)

Webster supporting compromise in Senate, 1850

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Lincoln Administration, Northern Society, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

virtual defeat

or virtual victory?

Plan of the Battle of Chickamauga, Tenn. by Robert Knox Sneden (gvhs01 vhs00158 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.ndlpcoop/gvhs01.vhs00158 )

September 20 at Chickamauga

I think I gave in to a little Yankee arrogance the other day when I noticed that Richmond seemed more in the dark about the battle at Chickamauga than the North. The New York Times apparently had a correspondent embedded with the Army of the Cumberland, but he did not seem to get a report back the next day as the bulk of Rosecrans’ army was hightailing it back to Chattanooga. What’s more, small towns in the North had to wait for accounts from the big cities, as can be seen from this article in a Seneca County, New York newspaper of September 1863:

Great Battle in Georgia.

The country was startled on Monday with the terrible news that Rosecrans had suffered defeat and disaster in Georgia, at the hands of the Confederate General Bragg. – The battle commenced on Saturday morning some little distance beyond Chattanooga, the enemy attacking our forces in overwhelming numbers. The engagement raged with great fury Saturday and Sunday, ending in the repulse of Rosecrans, and compelling him to fall back to Chattanooga. – The loss in killed and wounded on both sides is reported at 30,000. Both sides claim the victory, but it is evident that the advantage was with the rebels. The following dispatch published in the morning papers confirm the first reports received from Gen. Rosecrans army:

CINCINNATI, Sept. 24. – Mr. Shanks, the correspondent of the N.Y. Herald, has arrived here from the battle field of the Chickamanga [sic] where he has witnessed the two days fighting. He says:

That the official reports of the battle from Washington, are in the main totally false, and that really the army of the Cumberland have met with a defeat which must put it on the defensive for some time to come.

Major General George Henry Thomas, Union officer, half-length portrait, facing front (between 1861 and 1865; LOC: LC-USZ62-129689)

only his corps did any fighting

Gen. Thomas’ corps is the only one which did any fighting. On the first day it defeated Longstreet with terrible slaughter, driving him in great confusion for over a mile beyond the Chickamanga river.

Longstreet in a two hours fight lost 2,000 killed and over double that number in wounded.

Crittenden’s and McCook’s corps the same day were both badly beaten, and the enemy broke the center, driving Crittenden in every direction.

The defeat in this part of the line caused Thomas to abandon his field and fall back to protect his flank and re-establish his line. At the same time the enemy not knowing what he had accomplished failed to pursue the advantage, and Gens. Wood and Negley went in the center and re-established that part of the line. The day was ours though the enemy held the field.

We had taken three pieces of artillery more than we had lost on the first day, when Gen.Thomas had defeated Longstreet. On the second day he saved the army of Gen. Rosecrans from annihilation. – From 10 to 12 on Sunday he fought the enemy and repulsed them in three charges, when finding the assault in vain, the enemy pushed forward on the right and center, and on the first charge drove Crittenden’s and McCook’s line and routed their entire commands, driving them in a disgraceful manner into Rossville and Chattanooga.

Map of Battle of Chickamauga of the American Civil War, actions on September 20, 1863, part 3. Drawn in Adobe Illustrator CS5 by Hal Jespersen

Thomas and Granger hold back the rebels

Gen. Thomas, with his corps, still contested the day and was enabled by the timely reinforcements of Gen. Granger to hold a position until nightfall covered his retreat to Rossville.

Mr. Shanks left the field at 7 p.m. Sunday, and Chattanooga the noon of Monday.

Rosecrans was falling back on Chattanooga where he was perfectly safe from all Gen. Bragg could do.

His lines of communication were perfectly secure, and he had plenty of ammunition and provisions in Chattanooga to stand a month’s siege.

The result is virtually a defeat to us, as we have lost considerably in material, not less than fifty pieces of artillery falling into the enemy’s hands, though Bragg’s army receipts for twenty.

The rebel loss in killed and wounded will exceed our own. In killed he has lost double our number. Rosecrans is in no danger, but at the time Mr. Shanks left Chattanooga the danger to Gen. Burnside was very great.

Even The New York Times used the report of W.F.G. Shanks, although it did not mention him or his paper by name.

From The New-York Times September 25, 1863:

FROM ROSECRANS’ ARMY.; NO FIGHTING YESTERDAY. The Present Position of Our Forces Impregnable. HEAVY LOSSES ACKNOWLEDGED A New Account of the Result of the Battle. REPORTS FROM CINCINNATI.

WASHINGTON, Thursday, Sept. 24.

A dispatch from Gen. ROSECRANS, dated at his headquarters last night, says:

“I cannot be dislodged from my present position.”

Another dispatch from one of Gen. ROSECRANS’ Staff, written at forty minutes past 11 o’clock last night, says:

“No fighting to-day, the 23d.”

SECOND DISPATCH

WASHINGTON, Thursday, Sept. 24.

Advices received by the Government to-day from the Army of the Cumberland are to the effect that our wounded in the late three days’ battle before Chattanooga, have been conveyed to hospitals at Stevenson, and Bridgeport, in Alabama, and thence taken to Nashville as fast as they are physically able to be removed. The number of wounded recovered from the field, is not officially stated, nor whether any are now in the hands of the enemy.

CINCINNATI, Thursday, Sept. 24.

A gentleman, arrived here from the battle-field of Chicamauga, where he witnessed the two days’ fighting, says that the official reports of the battle, from Washington, are, in the main, totally false, and that really the Army of the Cumberland has met with a defeat which must put it on the defensive for some time to come.

Gen. THOMAS corps is really the only one which did any fighting. [and a recap of the rest of the report by its “informant”] …

In its October 10, 1863 issue Harper’s Weekly (at Son of the South) gave Mr. Shanks credit for the report they used and then then spun the battle like others in the North. Chattanooga was the key. As long as Rosecrans held Chattanooga, Chickamauga would be no more than the rebels’ Bunker Hill, a victory with no strategic value. It was predicted that both sides would reinforce their armies there:

Thus the issue would seem to be one of time. If Rosecrans can not hold out at Chattanooga until his reinforcements arrive, the whole of the Southern army will presently be in Chattanooga, and marching Northward through Tennessee; if he can hold out a few days only he will have force enough to offer Bragg battle with advantage, and can proceed at his leisure to occupy Atlanta, and give the death-blow to the empire which it was proposed to erect upon the corner-stone of slavery.

Hal Jespersen’s map of September 20 afternoon is licensed by Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Military Matters | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A return to normalcy?

Alexandria_Bird's_Eye_View_1863 (by Charles magnus, 1863: LOC: g3884a pm009504 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g3884a.pm009504 )

let the commerce (and duties) resume (1863)

After the defeat of the Army of the Cumberland at Chickamauga and its retreat back into Chattanooga, President Lincoln was very much involved in the decisionsto send reinforcements General Rosecrans in Chattanooga. In the midst of the crisis Mr. Lincoln proclaimed the lifting of the blockade of Alexandria just down the Potomac from the Executive Mansion.

From The Papers And Writings Of Abraham Lincoln, Volume Six:

PROCLAMATION OPENING THE PORT OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA,
SEPTEMBER 24, 1863.

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

A Proclamation.

Whereas, in my proclamation of the twenty-seventh of April, 1861, the ports of the States of Virginia and North Carolina were, for reasons therein set forth, placed under blockade; and whereas the port of Alexandria, Virginia, has since been blockaded, but as the blockade of said port may now be safely relaxed with advantage to the interests of commerce:

Alexandria, Virginia (vicinity). Battery Rodgers, erected in 1863, overlooking the Potomac river near Jones' Point. 15-inch Rodman gun (left). 200 pd. Parrott rifle and gun (right) (between 1862 and 1869; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpb-00635)

guns along the Potomac (near Jones’ Point)

Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United Sates, pursuant to the authority in me vested by the fifth section of the act of Congress, approved on the 13th of July, 1861, entitled “An act further to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes,” do hereby declare that the blockade of the said port of Alexandria shall so far cease and determine, from and after this date, that commercial intercourse with said port, except as to persons, things, and information contraband of war, may from this date be carried on, subject to the laws of the United States, and to the limitations and in pursuance of the regulations which are prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury in his order which is appended to my proclamation of the 12th of May, 1862.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the city of Washington, this twenty-fourth day of September in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-eighth.

A. LINCOLN.

By the President WILLIAM H. SEWARD,
Secretary of State.

Mary Todd Lincoln was up in New York City at this time and her husband sent her a few telegrams assuring her that the D.C. air was healthy and so it would be safe for her to return. Here’s an example:

TELEGRAM TO MRS. LINCOLN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 22, 1863.

MRS. A. LINCOLN, Fifth Avenue House, New York:—Did you receive my despatch of yesterday? Mrs. Cuthbert did not correctly understand me. I directed her to tell you to use your own pleasure whether to stay or come, and I did not say it is sickly and that you should on no account come. So far as I see or know, it was never healthier, and I really wish to see you. Answer this on receipt.

A. LINCOLN.

Washington was healthy; Alexandria was back open for business; but Chickamauga was still making its effects felt. 150 years ago today President Lincoln telegraphed Mary the news that her brother-in-law had been killed during the battle:

MRS. LINCOLN’S REBEL BROTHER-IN-LAW KILLED
TELEGRAM TO MRS. LINCOLN.

WAR DEPARTMENT, SEPTEMBER 24, 1863

MRS. A. LINCOLN, Fifth Avenue Hotel, New York:

We now have a tolerably accurate summing up of the late battle between Rosecrans and Braag. The result is that we are worsted, if at all, only in the fact that we, after the main fighting was over, yielded the ground, thus leaving considerable of our artillery and wounded to fall into the enemy’s hands., for which we got nothing in turn. We lost in general officers one killed and three or four wounded, all brigadiers, while, according to the rebel accounts which we have, they lost six killed and eight wounded: of the killed one major-general and five brigadiers including your brother-in-law, Helm; and of the wounded three major-generals and five brigadiers. This list may be reduced two in number by corrections of confusion in names. At 11.40 A.M. yesterday General Rosecrans telegraphed from Chattanooga: “We hold this point, and I cannot be dislodged except by very superior numbers and after a great battle.” A despatch leaving there after night yesterday says, “No fight to-day.”

A. LINCOLN.

It is written that after the brother-in-law’s death the Lincolns had his widow Emilie (Mary’s step-sister) live with them at the White House.

“A return to normalcy” was a campaign slogan of Warren G. Harding during the 1920 American presidential campaign.

alexandria and white house (by Robert Knox Sneden; LOC: gvhs01 vhs00240 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.ndlpcoop/gvhs01.vhs00240)

attention to detail: Robert Knox Sneden draws the White House, Smithsonian, and the “Monument”

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Military Matters | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

loads and loads of money

print away our problems?

Well, not really, as the editors at the Richmond Whig understood.

From The New-York Times September 25, 1863:

The following paragraphs are from the [Richmond] Whig, of the 23d: …

PAINFUL SIGHT.

It is nothing unusual to see a stout negro going through the streets of this city with a load of Confedrate treasury notes fresh from the stamping press. He is accompanied by a clerk, who superintends the tranfer of the stamping office to the Treasury. However painful this sight is in a politico-economical point of view, it does not equal the harrowing feeling produced by the never ending sound of the stamping presses at the old Richmond House. When these sights and sounds shall cease, we will begin to look for that good time coming in our financial affairs which we all hope to see. …

I don’t know how big the box of tobacco was in the following story, but it made me wonder given the rampant inflation in the Confederacy.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch September 24, 1863:

Stealing tobacco.

–A white man, named George Turner, was yesterday arrested and lodged in the cage for stealing from the store of Jones & Childrey one box of tobacco, valued at $150.

You can read an interesting overview of the Confederate currency system at mental_floss. Any long term value in the notes was based on a bet that the South would win the war, especially since the money was only redeemable sometime after a peace treaty with the United States. Or … if people did not know the CSA was no longer in existence. As late as 1909 German merchants were still accepting Confederate paper.

People are not sure where Richmond’s cage was, but it might have been Henrico County jail. Here’s an image of the lockup from Wikimedia based on the May 31, 1862 issue of Harper’s Weekly at Son of the South:

1862_Harper's_Weekly_Civil_War_View_of_Richmond,_Virginia_-_Geographicus_-_Richmond-harpersweekly-1862_part02_Henrico_county_jail

Henrico County jail, Richmond

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“a thorn in its vitals”

Chattanooga, Tenn. (vicinity) Nashville & Chattanooga railroad at foot of Lookout Mountain (photographed between 1861 and 1865, printed later; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-33493)

” Nashville & Chattanooga railroad at foot of Lookout Mountain”

Civil War Daily Gazette has the story of Abraham Lincoln’s damage control after the Union defeat at Chickamauga. The president urged General Rosecrans to hold on to Chattanooga and ordered General Burnside to “Go to Rosecrans”. Here he tells General-in-chief Henry Halleck that’s it’s advantageous to hold Chattanooga. It helps keep Tennessee in Union hands. The rebels are going to have to come and attack the federals to get back Chattanooga and its important railroad connections.

From The Papers And Writings Of Abraham Lincoln, Volume Six:

TO GENERAL H. W. HALLECK.
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, D. C., September 21, 1863.

MAJOR-GENERAL HALLECK:

Portrait of Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck, officer of the Federal Army (Between 1860 and 1865; LOC:  LC-DIG-cwpb-06956)

‘yes, Mr. President’

I think it very important for General Rosecrans to hold his position at or about Chattanooga, because if held from that place to Cleveland, both inclusive, it keeps all Tennessee clear of the enemy, and also breaks one of his most important railroad lines. To prevent these consequences is so vital to his cause that he cannot give up the effort to dislodge us from the position, thus bringing him to us and saving us the labor, expense, and hazard of going farther to find him, and also giving us the advantage of choosing our own ground and preparing it to fight him upon. The details must, of course, be left to General Rosecrans, while we must furnish him the means to the utmost of our ability. If you concur, I think he would better be informed that we are not pushing him beyond this position; and that, in fact, our judgment is rather against his going beyond it. If he can only maintain this position, without more, this rebellion can only eke out a short and feeble existence, as an animal sometimes may with a thorn in its vitals.

Yours truly,

A. LINCOLN.

The president had seen the advantage of defending a city in the Virginia theater. In a message to General Halleck on September 19th Mr. Lincoln remembered the Union’s Army of the Potomac failure to take Richmond in 1862:

... To avoid misunderstanding, let me say that to attempt to fight the enemy slowly back into his entrenchments at Richmond, and then to capture him, is an idea I have been trying to repudiate for quite a year.

My judgment is so clear against it that I would scarcely allow the attempt to be made if the general in command should desire to make it. My last attempt upon Richmond was to get McClellan, when he was nearer there than the enemy was, to run in ahead of him. Since then I have constantly desired the Army of the Potomac to make Lee’s army, and not Richmond, its objective point. If our army cannot fall upon the enemy and hurt him where he is, it is plain to me it can gain nothing by attempting to follow him over a succession of intrenched lines into a fortified city. …

georgia-battle-map (Harper's Weekly 10-3-1863)

keep control of Chattanooga – Cleveland (MAP OF THE THEATRE OF GENERAL ROSECRANS’S OPERATIONS IN THE STATES OF TENNESSEE AND GEORGIA.)

The map was published in the October 3, 1863 issue of Harper’s Weekly, which we can view at Son of the South

According to Wikipedia Henry Wager Halleck, as general-in-chief, was an excellent administrator but weak at grand strategy.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Military Matters, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment