using that Union instinct

150 years ago earlier this month Frederick Douglass made the case that the Civil War had to be primarily a war for abolition; there could never be a return to the old Union with its acceptance of slavery in the South. Here a Democrat editorial from upstate New York believed that the war had become a war for abolition and that the Republican administration was using the people’s love of Union to gain public support for its partisan purpose of freeing the slaves. If the Republicans and abolitionists had their way, there would indeed be a new Union that would upend the work of Washington and Madison.

The Union defenders certificate in support & defense of the government, the Union and the Constitution of the United States against the Great Rebellion ( Ehrgott, Forbriger & Co., lithographer  c1863; LOC: C-USZ62-90747)

certifiable love of the Union

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in January 1864:

Saving the Union.

That the people ardently desire a restoration of the Union is an undeniable fact. That its preservation is an object dear to the public heart all will readily admit. The love of the Union is an instinct with the American people, and this popular instinct has been the great power which the present administration has wielded to carry out its principles of negro equality. Assuming that the partisans in power were trying to restore the Union, it followed as a logical consequence that they had the right to remove whatever obstacles there were in the way of its restoration. This has afforded them them the excuse, to the popular mind, for all their assaults upon the Constitution and all their outrages against personal liberty. Persons often wonder why the people acquiesce in and seem to support all the unconstitutional acts of Lincoln’s administration. The easy answer to all this is, “the Union! the Union!” That is associated in the popular mind, as such an unmixed good, that anything and everything seems of less value.

[Civil War envelope showing Patriot labeled "Secured" holding the Constitution and Zouave soldier labeled "Defended," with message "The Union forever"] (Cin[cinnati] : Jas. Gates Pub., [1861]; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-34721)

secured, defended, … and changed in 1863?

But who sincerely believes that Mr Lincoln or his party has ever made the first effort to save the Union? Since the 4th day of March, 1861, all that has been done has tended to destroy it, and to make its destruction more certain and more sure. Is there a Republican in the land who does not know that the Union is to-day farther off than when Mr. Lincoln sent his first fleet to Charleston, and set in motion the awful train of circumstances that have followed? But beyond all this the men in power never wished to save the Union. They never wished to preserve it, and they do not, and are not, trying to restore it, and would not restore it if they could. Indeed, they never professed to be in favor of the Union. They abused and ridiculed it for years, derisively calling Democrats “Union-sayers,” who sought to avoid the terrible consequences of abolitionism. The Democrats know of no Union except that embraced in the terms of the Constitution, and consecrated by the fathers of the Republic. That Union abolitionism always repudiated, and to-day the whole power of the government is brought to bear to crush it out, and to destroy what little there [is] left of the great and glorious work [of a] Washington and a Madison.

In defence of the Union and the Constitution (	Peter S. Duval and son, lithographer, 1861; LOC:  LC-DIG-pga-03676)

old ideas from 1861?

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“salutary school of affliction”

Head-and-shoulders portrait of Frederick Douglass (Philadelphia? : J.W. Hurn?, ca 1870; LOC: LC-USZ62-24165)

war mission: Abolition

It’s been almost two years since we’ve put up a report on Frederick Douglass speaking at New York City’s Cooper Institute. 150 years ago this week he spoke there again. The war was dragging on, and it had to be a war for the abolition of slavery throughout the country. President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation did not go far enough and “may yet be negatived by Congress, the Supreme Court, or by cannon”, but President Lincoln did treat him with respect at the White House.

From The New-York Times January 14, 1864:

Frederick Douglass on the “Mission of the War.”

Last evening Mr. FREDERICK DOUGLASS addressed a very large and brilliant assemblage in the hall of the Cooper Institute, on the “Mission of the War.” The lecture was in behalf of the Woman’s Loyal League. Mr. WILLIAM CULLEN BRYANT who was announced as intending to preside, was called to the bedside of a dying relative, and Mr. OLIVER JOHNSON, Editor of the Anti-Slavery Standard, filled his place. Mr. DOUGLASS, on being introduced, remarked that men on all sides tell us that Slavery is dead; that it expired as the first shot was fired from Sumter. He was not so confident He looked facts sternly in the face, and saw in the future no miraculous abolition of Slavery. This war is a great national opportunity, which may be improved to a national salvation, or neglected to a national ruin. Vain the might of armies, vain the strength of armaments, if the Government fails to observe those principles of justice and liberty at bottom of the controversy. We are in the salutary school of affliction. If it can teach this great nation to respect those great principles toward a long neglected and cruelly crushed race, we are in a fair way for amendment, but, if this teacher is unheeded, whose lessons are burned into us by blood and fire, and thundered in our ears by the roar of a thousand battles, we shall be a warning to other nations to shun our cowardly example. We had seen in 1848 the sublimest revolution the world had yet experienced. It was regarded as the death of kingcraft. In the twinkling of an eye the powers of despotism rallied, and the hopes of democratic liberty were blasted in the moment of their bloom. Grave liabilities may also yet hang over our present struggle against the slave power of this country. The ladies of the Loyal League were to be thanked for keeping the question before the public. We are not yet out of danger. We were once informed by a hitherto sagacious political prophet, that the war would end in ninety days, yet it still rears its head in its third year, alone among rebellions, as a solitary and ghastly horror, never yet conjured among nations, drawing inspiration from a system, haggard, fiendish, and too indecent even to be mentioned in full. It has strewn our land with two hundred thousand graves, and filled it with mere stumps of men, destroyed property beyond the most exaggerated calculation, and piled up a debt heavier than a mountain of gold to be paid by our children; weakened our friends, encouraged our enemies, — and for what? For Slavery — that hell-black enormity that the people of this country have not even yet comprehended. Mr. DOUGLASS, after sketching the origin of the war, observed that this rebellion was enough for the lifetime of any one nation, even should it cover a thousand years, and it should be the voice of every patriot that whether the work cost much or cost little, it should be done thoroughly, [applause,] that it may be the last rebellion ever to curse American soil. The longer the war the better, if need be so, if it succeeds in abolishing the internal system of American Slavery. Say not that this comes from a negro who has no interest in the Union. I feel the deepest sympathy with it. I am an American, [applause,] and with many others participate in the deep privations of the moment. There are vacant places at my hearthstone, once filled by beloved sons, enlisted for the war, whom I live in hopes of seeing return. In this struggle we are writing in the blood of tyrants, the words of eternal justice. The war seems long, but its slow progress is essential to our salvation. The disease, being severe, the remedy must be both powerful and tardy. We were, morally, very low before it commenced, so much so that our great physician. Dr. BUCHANAN, on being called, decided there was no hope for us. We had been literally drugged to death with Pro-Slavery Compromises. There has been nothing so necessary as the slow and steady progress of this war. Why, look how we have grown! (laughing significantly at the enormous audience gathered to hear him, a colored man.) This is not acceptable, evidently, to certain Peace Democrats. The speaker urged the necessity of clearly defining the war as an Abolition war, and not shirking the question, as only in that sense can it be successful. We may admit it to be a war for the Constitution and the Union, but only in the sense that the lesser are included in the greater. Abolition includes both the Constitution and the Union of these States. Slavery was too strong for either. It came to the Constitution and broke it — to the Union, and sundered it. It must now, itself, be crushed. The Democratic party has had no other master than Slavery for forty years. It has made war and peace precisely according to its dictation. The Florida war even was commenced in the cause of Slavery. A few slaves ran from their civilized and religious masters, men of bibles and prayer-books, and took refuge with men of tomahawks. They found more of the milk of human kindness with Seminoles than with their pious and swindling masters.

Prominent candidates for the Democratic nomination at Charleston, S.C. [Composite of bust portraits of Stephens, Orr, Davis, Guthrie, Slidell, Pierce, J. Lane, Hunter, Breckenridge, Douglas, and Houston] (1860; LOC:  LC-USZ62-79475)

Slavery’s slaves

The speaker, in anathematizing the Democratic party, said there had been noble men in it, but they were outsiders now. It is now a religious party, and says “Blessed are the peacemakers,” and yet, for the sake of stopping the effusion of blood at the South, they arouse it at the North, till it culminates in deeds at which a savage would blush. He said that, notwithstanding our political victories, we are yet in danger of being ground beneath the heel of Slavery, and should consent to no peace which is not an Abolition peace, which declares free the whole colored race — [applause] — and which gives the freedmen of the South every civil and political right with their white brethren — [applause] — including the right to vote. [Great applause.] The dregs of the old treason will yet linger after the war, and the Federal Government needs a friend in the black man to stifle that treason. To win his friendship he must be granted rights. A morning paper says we are requested thus to introduce ignorance and degradation into the body politic. I scout this charge, said the speaker, with scorn. If a negro knows enough to be hanged, he knows enough to vote; if he knows honesty from roguery, he knows enough to vote; if he knows enough to fight for his country, if he knows as much sober as an Irishman when drunk, he knows enough to vote. [Tumultuous cheering,] He had hoped that Slavery and rebellion would find a common grave without further discussion, but found that the Proclamation settled nothing permanently. It may yet be negatived by Congress, the Supreme Court, or by cannon. He detested its principles. It says to rebels, we will take your slaves, but to loyal men, you may keep yours. It should have stricken Slavery everywhere. The President was brought to it with reluctance, as may be found in his letter to Mr. GREELEY. I have been to see the President — a man in a low condition, meeting a high one. Not Greek meeting Greek, exactly, but rallsplitter meeting nigger. Perhaps you would like to know how I, [???] negro, was received at the White House by the President of the United States. Why, precisely as one gentleman would be received by another. [Applause.] He extended me a cordial hand, not too warm or too cold. I had previously in a speech attacked him for his hardiness and vacillation. Without alluding especially to this speech, he defended himself against the charge of vacillation. “Mr. DOUGLASS, (‘he addressed me as Mr. DOUGLASS,’ added the speaker laughingly,) when I take a position, I think no man can say I retreat from it.” Like the rest of us, however, he has often been restrained by policy from doing what he felt to be a virtue; and that should be done.

Frederick Douglass Mural        in Washington, D.C. by G. Byron Peck. (LOC: LC-DIG-highsm-13251)

old Union’s “canonized bones sleep beneath the walls of Sumter.”

Mr. DOUGLASS observed that neither the Government or the loyal people have accepted the true mission of this war. We should have felt that the rebellion, was the signal for the entire abolition of Slavery, not simply for the preservation of the Constitution and the Union. We shall never again see the old Union. Its canonized bones sleep beneath the walls of Sumter. We are fighting now for something far beyond the Union in value — national unity, out of which only can Union truly spring. Union is else a body without a soul, a marriage without love, a barrel without hoops, that drops at the first touch. Mr. CALHOUN felt a national unity to be necessary, but strove to base it upon Slavery. Failing in this, his successors have endeavored to cut loose from the North, with broad blades and bloody hands. We want a country that will not brand our noble Declaration of Independence as a [???]. We wish to stay the taunts of Britain and the rest of Europe, and no longer hang our heads in shame, for our boasted liberty upon which Slavery still hangs as a millstone. We want a country where the Methodists from each section can meet in prayer and convention, without pistols and bowie knives, and in which the title of American citizen shall be as comprehensive as that of a Roman citizen in the palmiest days of the empire; where the school-house of New-England shall replace the whipping post of Carolina, and where the merchant shall no longer sell his soul to sell his goods. No North, no South, no East, no West! No white, no black, before the bar of justice.

The speaker took occasion to apostrophise Ireland, as “glorious old Ireland, that respects the black man on her own soil, and only oppresses him when upon Yankee soil.” Much as he deprecated their evil influence in our politics, he could not forget that while a slave, it was an Irishman that advised him to “cut and run,” and that he was once warmly received in Ireland, and welcomed to the platform of Conciliation Hall, by the noble O’CONNELL himself. The Irish have been befooled into the idea that work given to blacks will be taken from them, and that in case of emancipation there would be a rush of freedmen to the North to compete with them in labor. A great mistake. The rush Southward of blacks will be so great that there will not be enough left to save them.

Mr. DOUGLASS, after the lecture, was presented with $100 for his services, but handsomely returned $50 as a donation to the League.

John Brown and Fred'k Douglas [i.e. Douglass (ittleton, N.H. : Littleton View Co., publishers, c1891. Medium: 1 photographic print on stereo card : stereograph.; LOC: LC-USZ62-94342)

war for Abolition

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Northern Society | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“a question of numbers and of time”

While on winter break in Philadelphia 150 years ago this week, General Meade, commander of the Union Army of the Potomac, was serenaded. He used the occasion to encouraged the walking wounded in the audience to rejoin the army and, during a second serenade, urged everyone to do all they could to encourage recruits.

From The New-York Times January 14, 1864:

Gen. Meade at Home.; [S]ERENADES AND SPEECHES. THE SECOND SERENADE.

From the Philadelphia Inquirer, Jan. 12.

An imprompra serenade and welcome was given to Gen. MEADE, the hero of Gettysburgh, last evening, at the residence of Mr. BENJAMIN GERHARD, No. 226 South Fourth-street. The participants were the convalescent soldiers of the Broad and Cherry Hospital, accompanied by their band. The parlors of Mr. GERHARD were well filled by friends of the General and prominent citizens of our own and other States. Among the guests were Admiral Dupont, Mayor Henry and others.

The parlors were decorated with the tri-color, and when the soldiers reached the house the national airs were given. After they had ceased Gen. MEADE came forward. As he appeared in the dim light of the balcony his features were not discernible, and a soldier cried out, “Give us a light.” Gen. MEADE then responded to the serenade in the following address.

George Gordon Meade in uniform, full length portrait (by Thomas Hicks, between 1900 and 1920; LOC: LC-DIG-det-4a31274)

needs the men for the “hard fighting” ahead

“FELLOW-SOLDIERS: Those of you belonging to the Army of the Potomac who are from the field of Gettysburgh, as many of you doubtless are, need no light to recognize my voice and my features. I am delighted to see you here, and glad to see that you have so far recovered from your wounds that you are able to march out on this inclement night. And I am gratified that the soldiers of my old command should visit me and extend me such a welcome. (Cheers.)

We are anxious for your entire and speedy recovery. I have just left the army, where I must soon return. There all your old comrades are reenlisting, anxious to remain in the army until they bring this unnatural and unholy war to a termination; a termination which shall be satisfactory to us [???] a termination which will be worthy of the old flag and an honor to the Government. And this mu[s]t be the reestablishment of the old Union in its former glory and the acknowledgement of the Constitution [???] one end of this continent to the other. [Loud and continued applause.]

I am glad to see that you are all so well and able to leave your quarters to-night. I hope to find you soon in the ranks, where I am obliged to return. We are making every effort to improve the present, and, as soon as the weather moderates and the season will allow, active operations will be commenced anew, and in earnest. We want you all to be there. We want you all to return and to bring all you can with you; and may you all live to see what we all want to see, this struggle brought to a speedy and a glorious end. [Renewed applause.]

It is a question of numbers and of time. You all know that if we bring the men to the work, it will be ended speedily. I have nothing further to say, except that I return you my thanks for the welcome you have this night extended me.”

The soldiers continued cheering for their old leader for a long while after he ceased speaking. Admiral DUPONT was loudly called for, and, appearing in the balcony, was received with loud cheers. He declined speaking, and merely acknowledging the compliment tendered him, he retired. The soldiers then returned to the hospital.

The Union League assembled at their rooms later in the evening, and preceded by Birgfield’s Band, marched to the house where the General was stopping, and serenaded him for the second time. The whole street was closed with the people who accompanied the well-filled ranks of the Union League, and the second testimonial of the city’s admiration for its son and General was even more imposing than the first. The address delivered by Gen. MEADE was neat, terse and appropriate. His appearance was the signal for the most unmistakable manifestations of applause, terminating with three stentorian cheers for Gettysburgh. Then the General spoke:

“I am much obliged to you, my friends, for your compliment in giving three cheers for Gettysburgh. I am here but for a very few days, and have only visited my home to see my wife and children, and I am happy to hear you remember Gettysburgh and its deeds of heroic daring. I speak to Philadelphians; I have always felt it to be a matter of pride that I am a Philadelphian. Everything that I do in the discharge of my duties is increased and nerved with new strength when I think that I am a Philadelphian, and that my fellow-citizens of Philadelphia will be glad to hear, when I come back among them, that I have done my duty.

As I said when I took command of the Army of the Potomac, I say to you now, I have no pledges to make. When I return to my army, all I can say is that we will do the best we can to suppress the rebellion and to overthrow all those who are in arms against our common country; and we will do the best we can to have our flag respected, and to have it wave over every foot of ground from the Canadas to the Rio Grande and the golden sands of the Pacific. The banner of the Stars and Bars we will number among the things of the past, and the rebellion, with all its associations, will be remembered as things that have existed, but have no longer any being.

What we need is men. I want you here, all of you, every man of you, however small may be his influence, to use that influence to send recruits to the army. The more we get the better will it be for that army, and the quicker will the war be ended. The war must be ended by hard fighting, and it becomes every man, woman and child to work for the increase of our armies in the field, and when that is done I trust that next Summer will come to us with peace restored to the land, and happiness, contentment and prosperity pervading the entire country.”

The General retired amid great enthusiasm.

In a report from the front the Richmond Dispatch “X” correspondent began by referring to the North’s double-carrot approach to recruitment – generous furloughs and bounties. General Lee is issuing furloughs and using courts-martial to try to limit desertions. How will the Confederate Congress respond the manpower issue?

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch January 14, 1864:

From General Lee’s army.

[from our own Correspondent.]

Army of Northern Virginia, Jan.11th, 1864.

The situation remains essentially unchanged.–Both sides have occasionally to change camps for the purpose of getting wood. The enemy are hugging the railroad closely, busily engaged in securing re-enlistments of their three year’s men by the grant of a thirty-five days furlough, and bounties reaching as high in some instances as one thousand dollars. It is generally understood that they will preserve their old organizations undisturbed. Whilst this is the policy of our enemies, all eyes are turned to the Congress, and every patriot is anxiously solicitous to know the character of its legislation; for all feel that upon Congress hangs the fate of the country. I would again earnestly entreat them to lose no time in perfecting the military bill. Sixty days more and we may expect the campaign to begin. McClellan moved in 1862 as soon as March opened; whilst Hooker delayed until April only because a wide river intervened between him and us. There is, let me say again, no time for delay.

Mosby, the gallant guerilla chief, is constantly disturbing and harassing the enemy. …

Courts-martial are now in session all over the army, and a large amount of business is being disposed of. The desertions are much less frequent since the institution of the permanent system of furloughs in the army. Gen. Lee is now granting furloughs in the ratio of four to every hundred men present for duty. …

The Substitute bill has caused a general “skedaddling” among the sutlers, not less than twenty having been compelled on this account to close up and get ready to march either in the ranks or out of the country.

The weather during the past week has been intensely cold, and it has been with great difficulty that the men could keep comfortable. Blankets, overcoats, and shoes are still needed, and I am surprised that more and liberal donations are not received. I have alluded to this matter in my correspondence for the tenth and last time. If the people still refuse it is their fault, not mine. …

I have repeatedly seen allusions to the way in which this army is fed. Let me give the list of articles now on issue: Bacon, beef, flour, rice, molasses, sugar, and sure enough genuine store coffee, and occasionally sweet and Irish potatoes. It is a pity the demagogues in Congress cannot better employ their time than in publishing our want of bread and meat to the enemy. For two days the army did fail to get meat; but it was occasioned by the failure of cattle to arrive in time, and not because we could not have it. It is easier to find fault than to help the Government.

X.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters, Northern Society | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

tough nut to shell

Charleston 1864 by Robert Knox Sneden; LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/CABIB20007930)

Mr Sneden mapped “Houses Riddled By Our Shot & Shell”

It’s already going on three years since the federal garrison at Fort Sumter was evacuated as the shooting war started. But the Union wasn’t content to leave with its tail between its legs. The North had been trying to retake Charleston, that hotbed of secession, and its defiant fort. Since the latter part of 1863 the Federals had been trying to bomb the city and its defenders into submission. They have had little success. As a matter of fact, a Petersburg correspondent found that most of the bombs that hit the city fell in a lightly inhabited area already mostly destroyed by the December 1861 fire

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch January 13, 1864:

The firing into Charleston.

–A letter from Charleston published in the Petersburg Express, speaking of the firing into the city, says:

charleston-bombardment (Harper's Weekly, January 9, 1864)


BURSTING OF A SHELL IN THE STREETS OF CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA.
SKETCHED BY AN ENGLISH ARTIST.

The enemy’s fire into the city, seems to form almost a complete semi-circle. Beyond a certain point they have not reached. There is no harm, perhaps in saying that their farthest shot has only reached to within a few yards of Beautain street, and that their shortest shot fell in Water street.–Beginning then at Water street, near the battery promenade, and describing a half circle, including the Mills House, Charleston Hotel, and then going down to the bay again, will give you the exact area exposed to the Yankee fire. Many of the huge missiles find a lodging place without harming any one in what is known here as the “Burnt District. ” After all, that frightful conflagration of two years back, was in many respects a God send. It afforded a resting place for Yankee shells — It afforded debris, &c., enough to obstruct six harbors like ours — and material enough for the case work of batteries, bomb proofs, &c., innumerable. I took a stroll through the portion of the city exposed to the shells, two days since. It was an instructive and interesting stroll, though one necessitating some exposure. My way lay first up East Bay to Broad, up Broad to King, up King to Haxel, down Hazel to the Bay and back. Splintered glass, scattered bricks, large holes in the pavement, the perfect desolation and silence of death, all marked the spot as well deserted. No foot fall, save my own, awoke the leaches in the cheerless streets — and when once again I neared the precincts of a busy, breathing population. I sighed, as heaving a mighty weight from my breast. The effect of the shells there is no denying are serious and destructive. But very few strike the houses, and at this rate, years would be consumed in knocking to pieces, even this small portion of the city, exposed to Yankee malice.

The image of the bomb exploding was published in the January 9, 1864 issue of Harper’s Weekly at Son of the South, where you can also see Fort Sumter being shellacked but still in rebel control and read a description. The image in Charleston proper was from back when the bombardment began:

THE SIEGE OF CHARLESTON.

ON page 28 we give an illustration representing the effect produced by one of Gilmore’s shells bursting in the streets of Charleston. When Gilmore first began to shell the city it had more noncombatants in it than it has now; it was not believed that the city was within range until the actual reality brought conviction. The illustration is designed to represent the first occasion upon which the city was shelled, and depicts the overwhelming surprise of the citizens. The shelling commenced at midnight, but did little harm beyond terrifying the ladies left in the city. Only a single house was set on fire. … [and out in the harbor where the bombs are raining down on Sumter] Beauregard, it is said, is determined to hold the fort till the last; by the bayonet, if need be.

Fort Sumter, December 9th 1863, View of South East Angle (by John Ross Key, 1864 January 7; LOC:  LC-DIG-ppmsca-23067)

and they’ll defend with bayonets if necessary

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

down on the farmers

What price should Virginia farmers charge the Confederate army for their produce? An editorial from 150 years ago thought a low price was in the farmers’ self-interest.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch January 11, 1864:

The Farmers and the army.

The duty of supplying the army at liberal rates is one which it might be as well for the farmers of Virginia to consider from that fascinating point of view, their own interest. The question for them to decide is whether they will dispense liberally of their products to the defenders of their possessions, or whether they shall be overrun and laid waste, their estates destroyed, and their houses burned down over their heads by the advance of Meade’s army, which will follow the falling back of Lee, a calamity that the failure of the farmers to respond liberally to the calls of their country may render inevitable. If the farmers of Virginia prefer the condition of the people of Culpeper, Norfolk, and New Orleans, to their present state, they have only to keep fast their grip on their corn and wheat, and their desires can be gratified.

Of course, the government also taxed farmers (and others). One of the taxes on farmers and planters was a tax-in-kind . Those who owed taxes had to visit the tax collectors with their records. Farmers were warned to give their tax-in-kind only to authorized agents. From the same issue:

Confederate States taxes.

Notice to all persons liable to taxation by the Confederate Government in District No. 12 composed of that part of the city of Richmond lying west of 6th street–By authority of the Secretary of the Treasury, we hereby notify all persons liable to taxation — which embraces the great mass of the people of his District — that it is their duty to come forward and give in to us, the Assessors of this District a statement of their incomes, salaries, and all other subjects of taxation, that they may be assessed according to law; and to enable them to perform this duty, we hereby notify them that C. C. Ellett one of the assessors may be found at his residence on Leigh street, between 3d and 4th, at all times during the month of January, 1864; and William Forbes, the other assessor, will be at his office, at the corner of Main and 8th streets, from 9 o’clock A. M. to 3 o’clock P. M, of each day, and at his residence on Arch street, above 4th, after 3 o’clock P. M. of each day in the month of January, 1864, where they will respectively receive such statements and make such assessments.

C. C. Ellett,

Wm. Forbes,

Assessors for the 12th District of Virginia.

Richmond, Jan.1, 1864.

Notice to tax Payers

–State of Virginia–12th collection district C S war tax, composed of all that part of the city of Richmond which lies west of Sixth st.

All persons who have heretofore been registered, or who by law are required to register, are hereby notified to come forward within twenty days from this day and make their returns of gross sales for the quarter ending 31stDecember, 1863, inclusive, to Wm. Forbes or C. C. Ellett, the assessors for this district.

Any such person failing so to report within twenty days will be subject to a double tax. …

P. A. Woods, Collector

For 12th district of Va,
Richmond, Jan.1, 1864.

Ass’t Q’ m Gen’s office,
January2d, 1864.

Tax in Kind — Farmers and planters are notified that they must not deliver their tax in kind upon any other than receipts of Quartermasters and Commissaries serving with troops, and of officers and agents on tax duty, or of those who from this office are specially authorized to collect.

The receipts of sergeants, wagon masters, and teamsters are worthless, they have no authority, nor can any one give them authority, to receipt for tax in kind.

Larkin Smith,

Ass’t Quartermaster-General.

____________________________________________

Here’s how Edwin Forbes drew an “Old Va. farmer coming from mill. Rappahannock Station, Va.” from January 14, 1864:

Old Va. farmer coming from mill. Rappahannock Station, Va. (by Edwin Forbes, January 14, 1864; LOC:  LC-DIG-ppmsca-20595)

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

nurses should be paid

From The New-York Times January 10, 1864:

Ladies’ National Army Relief Association.

WASHINGTON, Thursday, Jan. 7, 1864.

To the Editor of the New-York Times:

Thankful for your courtesy in publishing my letter in your issue of the 3d, I desire to correct an error which causes me to say the opposite of what is true, viz.: That nurses do not desire pay outside of general hospitals. Desire should read receive.

To secure experience and permanence of service, the nurses should and must be paid and protected. All can understand that.

Our “Announcement” is out and the “Circular” will immediately follow.

Strong sympathy with our cause is everywhere met, and now as we enter the field to remove the last difficulty before us, (the want of means,) I feel assured this will disappear as have far more formidable ones that have melted, or are rapidly melting, away.

The noblest and best are ready to enter the field the moment we can receive them, and wasting lives implore the relief and saving care.

Women have an interest in the great Army of the Union. It encircles their most precious treasures, and military lines are loosing their severe rigidity quite [???] and what was early in the war an intrusion surrounded with great prejudice is now hailed with thankfulness whenever properly understood. SARAH P. EDSON.

P.S. — Communications can be addressed or interviews had at No. 713 Broadway, Room No. 20, until the 20th of January.

Here’s the original letter from The New-York Times January 3, 1864:

Nurses in the Army.

To the Editor of the New York Times:

My attention was arrested by an editorial in your issue of Sunday, the 13th inst., concerning “Nurses in the Army.” I was particularly struck with the clearness and justness of the whole article. I wish it might be read in every household in the land, and especially by our representatives, whose duty it is to protect the people, and lessen, as far as possible, all reasonable causes for complaint, and, more especially, to use all necessary means to relieve the sufferings of our noble and patriotic soldiers in the battle columns of our army.

Are they not the surrendered treasures of almost every Northern household? Are they not men whose lives are, if possible, more precious than before to the hearts of those who love them, and whose prayers ascend continually that they may be held in the hand of Him whose great cause they have gone forth to maintain and establish, even, if need be, to the giving up of life?

The great one body — the army — seems to lose all thought of the atoms of which it is composed. The man is but the thousandth part of a regiment, and totally swallowed up in the great army of the Union; but yet, in his own individuality, he is the loving and loved of the circle at home. Men seem almost to forget this in the great congregation of armed men, but whether it be so with us or not can be decided by the efforts we make to reach and save individual life.

Service in the army, from its commencement, in every variety, from the general hospital to the lengthened campaign and the great battle-fields, has given an education in the needs of our soldiers, and their sufferings and death, that must almost all remain in the hearts of those who witnessed them, for they cannot be uttered.

You speak of the defects of the ambulance and nurse system, or rather the utter lack of system or organization necessary to success.

None can realize how sadly, terribly true are these remarks but they who have seen the workings of disorganization on the field, especially the female assistance and care.

You speak of an association of ladies last Summer, dating from Washington, having in view the systematizing of this branch of field relief, but do not know whether anything has been accomplished, or whether they are now at work.

We are, most earnestly.

You say “if there are difficulties in the way of their success, they should at once be removed.”

Almost appalling difficulties have been met and evercome, advantages sought and obtained. We (nurses in the field) are now permitted to go and remain wherever surgeons desire our assistance, and that is everywhere where are sufferings in the army.

Permit me here to correct one error in statement. Nurses do not desire pay outside of general hospitals, nor are they entitled to rations, but they sometimes receive their food while at work, but frequently are obliged to support themselves. These we propose to support and pay, so that we may secure permanent service and the wealth of experience where it is so much needed.

The Secretary of War is desirous of doing, and has now done all that he, as a Government officer, can do, until legislation shall extend his powers, or create powers elsewhere to regulate and control the whole matter.

The only difficulty now remaining is the comparatively small means necessary to carry on our work.

Our “Circular” (The Ladies’ National Army Relief Association) will be given to the public in a few days, and we earnestly hope such responses will be given as will place us at once in the field with the thousand-fold advantages of organization, experience, responsibility and skill, as against the losses and embarrassments attending the lack of all these.

Commanding and medical officers of every grade are ready to welcome our members to the field, for we propose to relieve them of the serious embarrassments of caring for us in emergencies, by taking under our care all nurses when the army moves.

The law gives no protection for female nurses in this department.

We will look after the sick who are left behind, and hold all nurses so near, that they can at once be at the post of duty when needed.

All the duties or necessities in this our chosen field of labor, cannot be hinted at in this article, nor the earnest calls that bid us enter, nor the blessings, nor the expressions of gratitude, nor the tears of thankfulness that have traced the tanned and bearded cheeks of brave men, that have followed the crippled and imperfect services of volunteer labor.

Our “Circular” will tell some of these.

We do not now despair after fourteen months untiring effort and determination to bear down the difficulties that prevented a proper answer to the calls of a hundred thousand suffering men, who need our experience and care.

By the help of the people we will in a few days become a band of “recruiting officers” that will give back to the ranks a drilled man, and instead of making another home lonely, we will save homes and hearts from sorrow and mourning.

Will the people send us to recruit in this pleasant manner?

Our commissions will cost only our support while on duty.

Severe trials of health await the new soldiers about to be sent out. Time is of golden value in providing experienced care.

Shall we be supported? — the last difficulty now before us. [???] SARAH P. EDSON.

President Ladies’ National Army Relief Association.

Sarah P. Edson was born up here in the Finger Lakes region, in Fleming, Cayuga County.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Military Matters, Northern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

comfortable Richmond

Richmond, Virginia. Spotswood hotel. (Main Street) (by Alexander Gardner, April 1865; LOC:  LC-DIG-cwpb-00458)

at the Spotswood

Almost three years into the war people in Richmond can still get a good meal at the Spotswood Hotel, a place apparently far-removed from the Bread Riot Richmond of April 1863.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch January 9, 1864:

Deserving of Praise.

–At the present time, when everything is scarce and hard to get, it is surprising how the hotel-keepers of Richmond keep up their tables in the style which they do. With regard to one of them, the “Spotswood,” we will say that, with the exception of the luxury of fresh salt-water fish, which cannot be had, there is scarcely any difference in the manner in which it is conducted now than there was before the war.–A practical test justifies us in saying that it is equal, to say the least, to any other hotel in the South, and persons visiting Richmond for pleasure or business should make their time as agreeable as possible by stopping at this well-kept establishment. Its enterprising proprietors, Messrs. Corkery [sic?] & Betts, as well as the superintendent of the dining room, Mr. Sherry, have be superiors in their departments, and, devoting their whole attention to the business, the guests of the hotel are not long in finding out that they have selected the most comfortable stopping place in the city.

As you can see from Alexander Gardner’s April 1865 photo, the Spotswood survived the war; however, it could not survive 1870, the Year of Disasters. A fire at the hotel killed eight people. You can see the ruins at Civil War Richmond.

There is evidence that the proprietors might have been a little too enterprising for the authorities. In July 1864 William F. Corkley [sic?] was charges with violating the anti-liquor law by selling brandy (not soda water and raspberry vinegar) at the hotel bar. The case was dismissed because the witness didn’t show up at court.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Southern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

boy martyr

David_Owen_Dodd

wouldn’t divulge his source

On January 8, 1864 “Seventeen-year-old David O. Dodd is hanged as a Confederate spy in Little Rock, Arkansas.”[1]

David Owen Dodd was caught with sensitive documents on his trip from Union-occupied Little Rock back to his family in Camden, Arkansas. The federal army took Little Rock in September 1863 and Confederate troops retreated to the southwest of the state. David O. Dodd was called the “Boy Martyr of the Confederacy” because he refused to tell the Union authorities the source of his information and was hung as a result.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch March 23, 1864:

Execution of a Confederate.

–David Owen Dodd, aged seventeen, son of a merchant of Little Rock, Ark, was executed by the Federal military authorities there, a few weeks since, as a spy. A letter says:

Arkansas 1854 (LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/2002624049)

divided state – Camden to southwest of Little Rock (1854 map)

Mr. Dodd had a short time previous to the execution of his son removed his family to [from] Little Rock, and had sent his son back on business. While there he gained important information in regard to the garrison and defences of the city, and had noted them in telegraphic characters in his memorandum book. On his way to Camden he was by a Federal scout, who searched him and found the fated book. He was taken to Little Rock, tried by court martial, and sentenced to be hung as a spy. Previous to his execution, Gens. Steele and Davidson both conversed with him, assuring him of their sympathy on account of his extreme youth. And as they knew some one intimate about their headquarters had given him the information, they proffered to release him on condition he would divulge the name of his informant. This he scorned to do, saying if a wrong had been committed he was the guilty one, and “that a man that would not die for his principles was not ” When brought to the ascended it, calmly pulled off his coat and met his fate without a shudder. Two hours before his execution he wrote with a steady hand his “last letter” to his parents and sisters, telling them not to weep for him, but to meet him in Heaven. Seldom do such instances of pure, disinterested patriotism occur.–Never will a grateful people forget the memories of the noble dead who have freely offered that to lives for their country, and there are none whose names will be more gratefully embalmed than the subject of this memoir. Rather than betray his friends, he preferred death, and thereby crowned his name with immoral [sic] bonnet.

You can read his “last letter” from 1:00 AM 150 years ago today and a long account of the incident at knowsouthernhistory. You can also find his grave.

The map here shows the extent of the Union occupation of Arkansas in January 1864.

  1. [1]Fredriksen, John C. Civil War Almanac. New York: Checkmark Books, 2008. Print. page 388.
Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Military Matters | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

rosy outlook from dismal science

How can the Northern economy be doing relatively well given the labor and wealth wasted on the war? High labor productivity applied to a big and well-endowed country that can take in large numbers of immigrants, who add to the nations wealth. Technology and the free labor system have increased productivity.

From The New-York Times January 7, 1864:

The Losses of War How they are to be Replaced.

Economists have always spoken of “efficiency” of labor as one great source of wealth that is, the application of forethought, invention and industry to production, so that the greatest possible result is obtained for the force applied. It is this peculiarity of American labor which is so rapidly now replacing the losses of this war, and which is each day opening new sources of wealth. To many minds both here and in Europe, the financial condition of this country, during this fearfully wasteful war, has been a mystery and an anomaly. How a nation could be throwing into the sea, as it were, several hundreds of millions every year, and not be plunging into bankruptcy and ruin, was something at first inexplicable to students of finance and economical science.

Expenses of living, it is true, owing to the tariff and the depreciation of the currency, have greatly risen, yet the great and wonderful fact remains that the principal source of our wealth still exists in immense surplus; in other words, the production from agriculture, even with a million of laborers unemployed and fed at the public expense, has been greater than ever before. We have fed the army, our own people, and, to a certain extent, the population of Europe, and still have so much surplus that flour, maize and beef are not so high as they have been often in former years.

Nothing will explain this astonishing fact but what has been called the “efficiency” of our labor; that is, the application of brain to labor under the most unusually favorable conditions. Here, almost for the first time in the history of the world, we have a rapidly advancing population, an increasing capital, boundless material advantages in our alluvial soil and water communications, and a constant application of improvements to agriculture. The conditions for production never existed to such a degree in any country. Already we discover that the teeming brain of the Anglo-American has filled the gap made by the withdrawal of a million of laborers by machines of agriculture, so that production in proportion to the demand, remains as large as ever. No doubt, too, the high rate of wages has called out a great deal of comparatively idle and unproductive labor, and turned it to the most profitable employment.

Along with this constant filling up of the losses of war, we begin to discover that other veins of wealth are opening, which will go far to remove from us some of the burdens of our national debt. The cotton lands of the South, as they are opened and protected by our armies, are becoming an EI Dorado to the fortunate Northerners who have cultivated them. We hear already of fortunes rapidly made by enterprising Yankees on the Mississippi and near New-Orleans, such as the history of Peru or California could hardly equal. These accounts may be exaggerated, but there can be no rational doubt that the cotton and sugar plantations, under freed labor and during the high prices of these staples, will pour in a flood of wealth upon the country.

It must be remembered that freed labor is more “efficient” than slave labor; that the emancipated slaves work more steadily under Northern employers than Southern; that Northern capital will inevitably flow into these districts, and that the price of cotton must be high during the long and gradual close of the war, which now seems probable. With such conditions, a small territory may reap profits which were once enjoyed by the whole South. Or, accepting OLNSTED’s theory, that the whole surplus wealth of the South was always the produce of a comparatively few plantations under slave labor, our people having possession of those very plantations, may obtain from the world a vastly greater profit than used to flow to us from the whole Southern export.

Similar facts are also beginning to present themselves in California and the neighboring districts. The mineral wealth which, is opening in the veins of the Rocky Mountains and their numerous spurs, is represented by trustworthy observers, as beyond all calculation. Immense fortunes are being made each day in some of the mining districts. Some of the largest mines have come into the possession of the most solid and careful associations, who employ talent and capital, without stint, to extort the boundless wealth which lies hid in them. It is safe to say that a vast increase of wealth will flow into the country during the next twenty years from this source alone. All these prosperous undertakings will besides, augment another great source of our wealth — immigration — so that in the years succeeding the waste and loss of this war, we may reckon on such an increase of production in the United States as has never been known in human history. Providence will heal the wounds of the nation, and justify by its material blessings a war which has been fought for principles.

Civil War camp scene, showing company kitchen, 1863(?) ( photographed 1864, [printed later]; LOC:  LC-DIG-ppmsca-33113)

happy campers? “during the long and gradual close of the war” (LOC: 6th N.Y. Artillery at Brandy Station, Va. April, 1864)

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Northern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

big squeeze at the meat market

Hey, civilians have to eat, too

Sign, Kenner, Louisiana (by Russell Lee, 1938 Sept; LOC: LC-DIG-fsa-8a23543)

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch January 6, 1864:

The meat Market,

in 17th street, was the scene of no little excitement yesterday morning, caused by the appearance of a C. S. officer, who purchased between fifty and seventy quarters of fresh beef, leaving but a limited supply for individual purposes. Surely, the Government does not intend to come into the city markets to get supplies at a time like this. If its agents do not furnish meats, with all the railroads and other public highways at their command, how is it possible for the butchers in the city markets to supply them? The Secretary of War has had the matter brought to his attention by the City Council, and will no doubt give our people protection for the future.

Here is evidence that the officer might have been a Mr. Moffitt buying for the Army of Northern Virginia.

If the agent was paying with Confederate currency, it was an increasingly bad deal for the butcher. According to the Dispatch paper money was only worth a fourth as much as a year earlier.

The sign was really from Kenner, Louisiana.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment