civil war

150 years ago today a Southern newspaper looked to the American Revolutionary War to find a general who knew the polite way to wage a war of subjugation. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch March 26, 1864:

Two extracts from revolutionary History.

The war carried on by Great Britain against the colonies during the Revolution was waged for subjugation. The present war, waged by the Yankees against independent States, is for the same object. The original manuscript order book of Lord Cornwallis is in the possession of a gentleman near Fayetteville, N. C., and the following extracts from it are published to show the difference between the conduct of the Commanding Generals of the British army in the seventeenth [sic] and the Yankee army in the nineteenth centuries:

Headq’rs Cantear’s Plantation,
2d Feb’y, 1781.

Lord Cornwallis ( Paternoster Row, [London] : Published by J. Fielding, 1786 March 31st; LOC: LC-USZ62-45340)

shocked by his troops’ excesses

Orders– Lord Cornwallis is highly displeased that several houses were set on fire during the march this day — a disgrace to the army — and that he will punish with the utmost severity any person or persons who shall be found guilty of committing so disgraceful an outrage. His lordship requests the commanding officers of corps will endeavor to find out the persons who set fire to the houses this day.

Headquarters, Saulsbury.
5th Feb’y, 1781.

It is with great concern that Lord Cornwallis acquaints the army that he has lately received the most shocking complaints of the excesses committed by the troops. He calls in the most serious manner on the officers commanding brigades and corps to put a stop to this , which must inevitably bring disgrace and ruin on His Majesty’s service. He is convinced that it is in their power to prevent it, and has seen so many proofs of their zeal for the service of their country that he cannot doubt of their exertions to defeat and punish offenders; without which the blood of the brave and deserving soldiers will be shed in vain, and it will not be even in the power of victory to give success.

Great complaints having been made of negroes straggling from the line of march, plundering and using violence to the inhabitants, it is Lord Cornwallis’s positive orders that no negro shall be suffered to carry arms on any pretence, and all officers and other persons who employ negroes are desired to acquaint them that the Provost Marshal has received orders to seize and punish on the spot any negro following the army who may offend against this regulation.

Headq’rs, Dobbin’s House,
17th February 1781.

Lord Cornwallis is very sorry to be again obliged to call the attention of the officers of the Army to the repeated orders against plundering. He desires that the orders given on the 28th January, 4th February, and the 16th February, may be read at the head of each troop and company on each of the three first halting days, and he assures the officers, that if their duty to their King and country, and their feelings for humanity, are not sufficient to enforce their obedience to them, he must, however reluctant, make use of such power as the military laws have placed in his hands.

Brigade morning Orders,2d March, 1781.

A foraging party, consisting of one officer, two sergeants, two corporals, and twenty-four privates, to assemble at the guns this morning at 8 o’clock with the battalion horses.

Notwithstanding every order, every entreaty, that Lord Cornwallis has given to the army to prevent the shameful practice of plundering and distressing the country, and those orders backed by every effort that can have been made by Brigadier General O’Hara, he is shocked to find this evil still prevails and ashamed to observe that the frequent complaints he receives from headquarters of the irregularity of the guards particularly affects the credit of this corps. He therefore calls upon the officers, non-commissioned officers, and those men who are yet possessed of the feelings of humanity and actuated by the best principles of soldiers, the love of their country, the good of the service, and the honor of their own corps, to assist with the same indefatigable diligence the General himself is determined to persevere in, in order to detect and punish all men and women so offending with the utmost severity and example.

The General is convinced the exertions of the officers alone will not so immediately bring about this reformation as requisite, but he trusts he may have the greatest dependence on the assistance of the non commissioned officers and every good soldier, many of whom he knows are above these practices. The General has wished not to trouble the men with too many frequent roll-calls, but he is sorry to find his intentions are frustrated by their irregularity, and is therefore obliged to order the most frequent roll-calls, and that all men absent therefrom shall be deemed disobedient of orders, tried and punished before the company on the spot. Women to attend all roll-calls in the rear of the such as are in the service of brigade.

The Commandants are desired to proceed to the trial of those men offending yesterday, and to put the sentence of the Court-Martial in execution immediately, in the presence of all the officers.

N B.–The women to attend all punishments. …

the Richmond editors probably appreciated the general’s order to disarm the black servants.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mr. Fillmore’s view

Pres. Millard Fillmore (between 1855 and 1865; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpbh-00698)

distinguish between rebel armies and Southern multitude

In addition to New York City and Albany, Buffalo opened a fair on Washington’s Birthday in 1864. 150 years ago today a Richmond newspaper published some of Millard Fillmore’s remarks. Mr. Fillmore thought the rebel army should be destroyed with as little collateral damage as possible, then offer the deluded southern masses forgiveness and reconciliation. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch March 25 1864:

Ex-President Fillmore on the War.

–The Northern papers bring us the first expression of opinion on the war that we have seen from Millard Fillmore. At the opening of the great Central. Fair, at St. James’s Hall, Buffalo, he is reported to have spoken as follows:

Three years of civil war have desolated the fairest portion of our land; loaded the country with an enormous debt that the sweat of millions yet unborn must be taxed to pay; arrayed brother against brother and father against [s]on in mortal conflict; deluged our country with fraternal blood; whitened our battle finds with the bo[nes] of the slain, and darkened the sky with the pall of mourning. Yet these appalling calamities — which as yet have touched our city more lightly than any other in the land — have imposed upon us new duties, which must be promptly met and gener[ously] discharged, and new burdens which must be patiently and cheerfully borne.

We cannot, in our humble capacity, control the events of this desolating war. We hear its thunders and mark the track of desolation, and we must meet the emergency as best we can, but never despair of the [R]epublic. It is no time now to inquire whether it might have been avoided. Let those who seek light on this subject read Washington’s Farewell Add[r]ess. Nor are we now to criticise the conduct of those who control it, awarding praise here and bestowing censure there. The impartial historian will [do] this when the passions engendered by the strife have cooled, and partisan prejudice, petty jealousies, malignant envy, and intriguing, selfish ambition shall be laid in the dust, and, it is hoped, buried in oblivion. As much less are we called upon to predict when or how this war will end. Let those who seek light on the subject read Gen. Jackson’s Farewell Address.

But let us hope an all-wise, and merciful Providence will incline the hearts of the people, North and South, to peace — to a lasting peace, with a restored Union, c[e]mmented by fraternal affection, under our well-tried and glorious Constitution.

Nor is this the time or place to express an opinion as to the policy then should be pursued to reach so desirable an end. But one thing is clear, that much must be forgiven, if not forgotten, on both sides, before this Union can ever be restored; and therefore, it in to be hoped that all unnecessary acts of cruelty or wanton destruction of private property, or insult, or insolence in triumphing over a fallen foe should be avoided; for all such acts only fire the heart of our adversary with resentment and revenge and thus protract the war, increase its h[orrors], and leave a sting which will reader reunion more difficult, it not impossible.

But it must be apparent to all that the first step toward bringing this war to a close is to conquer the [rebel] army. Any negotiations for peace before this is done would prove abortive; and any professed clemency to those in arms who d[efy] our power would be a mockery which would be treated with ridicule and contempt. But, when we have conquered their armies and disposed of their leaders, then let us show our magnanimity and generosity by winning back the deluded multitude who have been seduced or coerced into this rebellion, by extending to them every act of clemency and kindness in our power, and by restoring them to all their rights under the Constitution. This I conceive to be Christian forgiveness and the best policy, and the only one which can ever restore this Union.

You can read a more complete account of the speech here.

Not everyone had the same attitude about private southern property. From the same issue:

Devastation by Sherman.

–The Brandon (Miss) Republican publishes a list of nearly a column in length of the losses of private citizens by the Yankee’s with Sherman. They range from $1,000 to $100,000. Among the heaviest cosers are: In Brandon, A G Mayers $70,000; W B Lancaster’ $60,000; B F H Lamb, $60,000; Henry & Tappan’ $40,000–in Rankin, R Shotwell & Son, $100,000; Mrs. Melton, $75,000; Dr. H H Parker, $50,000; H Battle, $45,000; A C Miller, $40,000; and Mrs. Ratcliff, $40,000.

During the Civil War Millard Fillmore

denounced secession, and supported the Union war effort, but also became a constant critic of the war policies of President Lincoln, such as the Emancipation Proclamation.

He commanded the Union Continentals, a corps of home guards of males over the age of 45 from the upstate New York area. The Continentals trained to defend the Buffalo area in the event of a Confederate attack, as happened in the St. Albans Raid, and was planned for Johnson’s Island. They performed military drill and ceremonial functions at parades, funerals, and other events. The Union Continentals guarded Lincoln’s funeral train in Buffalo. They continued operations after the war, and Fillmore remained active with them almost until his death.

 New York State Historic Marker for the birthplace of President Millard Fillmore.          Located near the town of Summerhill, Cayuga County, New York.

long way to Buffalo

The 13th U.S. president was born in southern Cayuga County, New York. The image is licensed by Creative Commons.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Northern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

diggin’ for the CSA

This notice has been running in the Dispatch most of the month. The Confederate Niter and Mining Bureau was tasked with supplying necessary minerals and metals to the South’s military. As white men continued to get killed and wounded and diseased, the Bureau had to tap other sources of labor.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch March 24, 1864:

C. S. A, War Department,
Nitre and Mining [B]ureau,

Richmond, Va, March 7, 1864.

Wanted — To hire, 400 Slaves or Free Negroes. Under a recent act of Congress slaves and free negroes can now be impressed for Government work. The Nitre and Mining Bureau need some four hundred hands, and will give the regular Government price–$300, board and clothes.–Parties hiring slaves to this [b]ureau before the order of impressment will be credited with the number so hired in their quota under the call for negroes for any kind of Government service.

Whig, Examiner, Sentinel, Enquiror, and Lynchburg papers copy.

According to Encyclopedia Virginia that $300 was iffy and the slaves often came back to their masters in bad shape:

Still, reimbursement was often slow in coming if it came at all. Government bureaus also regularly impressed slaves at the height of the harvest season and kept them beyond their contracted term of service. Because of poor living and working conditions, many slaves returned to their masters in poor health. Despite protests from slave owners, slave impressments proved critical in allowing the Confederate government to shore up fortifications and keep the war machine churning out arms and ammunition until the very end.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

snowball’s chance in Dalton?

Pretty good in March 1864:

The snowball battle near Dalton, Georgia (by Alfred R. Waud; Published in: Joseph M. Brown's The Mountain Campaign in Georgia, 1890; LOC:  LC-DIG-ppmsca-21383)

“grand mock battle” March 22, 1864

It is written: “On rare occasions it snowed and like children released from school, the troops treated any snowfall as an occasion for play. On March 22 dawn revealed a fresh 5 inches of new snow, and a spontaneous snowball fight broke out all across the camp. The men threw themselfs into the fracas with enthusiasm.”

March 1864 was indeed cold and a time for sham battles for the Confederates in North Georgia. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch march 18, 1864:

Military drill.

Dalton, March16.

Lieut. Gen. Hood had a grand drill of his corps to-day, which, notwithstanding the severity of the weather, was largely attended, especially by general officers. After the drill a sham battle was fought by the entire corps of musketry and artillery. The firing was splendid and the whole affair very imposing, and drew forth the warmest praise from all who witnessed it.

The weather here is excessively cold.

You can see a different image of the snowball fight in The mountain campaigns in Georgia : or, War scenes on the W. & A (page 23).

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

pledge passive allegiance?

After endorsing B.F. Butler for the United States presidency because he was the biggest thief among the candidates, the Richmond Daily Dispatch of March 21, 1864 published the following exchange of letters between General Butler and a Virginia schoolteacher:

Uncle Abe--"Hello! Ben, is that you? Glad to see you!" Butler--"Yes, Uncle Abe. Got through with that New Orleans job. Cleaned them out and scrubbed them up! Any more scrubbing to give out?" (by John McLenan, Harper's Weekly, 1-17-1863; LOC: LC-USZ62-138378 )

Now cleaning up Accomack County

Butler on the oath of allegiance.

–The following correspondence is published as having occurred between Butler and the lady whose name is signed to the first letter:

Locustville, Accomac Co., Va., March10, 1864.

General B. P., Butler:

Sir:

My school has been closed since Christmas, because; as I understood the oath required of us, I could not conscientiously take it. Having heard since that one of your officers explains the oath as meaning simply that we consent to the acts of the United States Government, and pledge passive obedience to the same, I take the liberty of addressing this to you, to ascertain if you so construct the oath. I cannot understand how a woman can “support, protect, and defend the Union,” except by speaking or writing in favor of the present war, which I could never do, because my sympathies are with the South. It by those words you understand merely passive submission, I am ready to take the oath and abide by it sacredly.

Very respectfully,

Mary S. Graves.
Headq’s 18th army Corps.
Department of Virginia and N. C.,

Fortress Monroe, March14, 1864.

My Dear Madam:

–I am truly sorry that my Union officer of mine has attempted to fritter away the effect of the oath of allegiance to the Government of the United States, and to inform you that in means nothing more than passive obedience to the same.

That officer is surely mistaken. The oath of allegiance means fealty, pledge of faith to, love, affection, and reference for, the Government, all comprised in the word patriotism, in its highest and truest sense, which every true American feels for his or her Government.

You say, “I cannot understand how a woman can support, protect, and defend the Union, except by speaking or writing in favor of the present war, which I could never do, because my sympathies are with the South.”

The last phrase, madam, shows why you cannot understand “how a woman can support, protect and defend the Union.”

Were you loyal at heart you would at once understand. The Southern women who are Rebels understand well “how to support, protect and defend” the Confederacy, “with out either speaking or writing.” Some of them act as spies, some smuggle quinine in their under clothes, some smuggle information through the lines in their dresses, some tend sick soldiers for the Confederacy, some get up subscriptions for rebel gunboats.

Perhaps it may all be comprised in the phrase, “where there is a will there is away. “

Now, then, you could “support, protect and defend the Union,” by teaching the scholars of your school to love and reverence the Government, to be proud of their country, to glory in its flag, and to be true to its Constitution. But, as you don’t understand that yourself, you can’t teach it to them; and, therefore, I am glad to learn from your letter that your school has been closed since Christmas, and with my consent, until you change your sentiments and are a loyal woman in heart, it never shall be opened.

I would advise you, madam, forthwith to go where your “sympathies” are. I am only doubtful whether it is my duty to send you.

I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

B. F. Butler,

Major General Commanding.

To Mrs. Mary L. Graves, Locustville, Accomac county, Virginia.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters | Tagged , | Leave a comment

reprieve

Fort Jefferson at the Dry Tortugas

Fort Jefferson at the Dry Tortugas

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

SENTENCED TO BE SHOT. – At a recent court martial, presided over by Capt. Winfield Scott, of the 126th Regiment, private Chas. Audler, of the 108th Regiment, was tried, convicted, and sentenced to be shot, for desertion. The sentence of the Court has been approved by Gen. Meade, and it will be carried into effect on Friday of next week.

Or maybe not:

Charles Audley

sent to the Gulf of Mexico

Captain Winfield Scott would leave the army for a different reason:

Winfield Scott

wounded in May

According to the National Park Service the prisoners at Fort Jefferson in the Dry Tortugas during the Civil War were indeed mostly army deserters.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Military Matters | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

crucible

A southern editorial on how war reveals a person’s true character.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch March 19, 1864:

Demoralization.

We hear a great deal about the demoralizing effects of the war in the United States and in the Confederacy. Doubtless this is true to a certain extent. But, in the main, this war, like all other wars, has simply revealed the native tiger and beast in human nature — not created it. It has, as a French friend of ours used to pronounce the word, “devil-up” the character of the community. The men who are now so openly bad, the monsters who are so bloodthirsty, the speculators who are so ravenous, the tyrants who are so cruel, were always bad, ravenous, bloody, and cruel. The war has simply thrown the broad glare of a policemen’s lantern upon midnight prowlers, rogues, and murderers. It has simply torn the veil from the character of men, and revealed them for the first time to the world, and perhaps to themselves. “Is thy servant a dog, that he should do this thing?” said Hazael, when the man of God predicted the atrocities he should commit in his future career. Yet he was a dog though he knew it not, and so the dogs of the present war were always dogs, possessed of all the vile instincts which the war has simply developed and disclosed to their own eyes and those of the world.–They need not charge the war with their demoralization. The war has only found them out, and made patent the original and inherent corruption of their character.

Washington_and_Lee_U._1948_U.S._stamp.1(Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia was commemorated on its 200th anniversary on November 23, 1948, with a 3-cent postage. The central design is a view of the university, flanked by portraits of generals George Washington and Robert E. Lee.)

But, when we talk of the demoralization of the war, has not the war done something the other way? Has it not revealed good qualities as well as bad, and introduced to the world and to themselves virtuous as well as evil men? Has it not disclosed in the almost unknown Robert E. Lee a closer resemblance to George Washington than we had supposed humanity could ever again furnish? But for the war, Stonewall Jackson might have gone to his grave an obscure professor in the Virginia Military Institute, ignorant, in his saintlike humility, of those wonderful qualities which have filled the world with the glory of his name. And what a host of virtuous and heroic deeds has this war elicited in the citizen soldiery of the South, deeds which are innumerable as the stars of Heaven, and which would never have been seen but for the darkness that has covered the sky! Like the ordeal of the last Judgment, the war has separated the wheat from the tares, the sheep from the goats, the just from the unjust, and revealed all men to themselves and to the world in their real character.
From the same issue:

Gen. R. E. Lee.

Robert_E_Lee_Stain_Glass (Stain glass of history of Robert E Lee in the National Cathedral)

Lee in stained glass at theNational Cathedral

–A friend who travelled with the General on his way down from Gordonsville to Richmond, says he has a very hail and vigorous appearance and looks as though there were a dozen or more good campaigns in him yet. He is a man of fine commanding six feet or upwards in height, and weighs probably the rise of one hundred and eighty. But for his white beard, which he wears entire, but trimmed short, and his silvery hair, he would be comparatively a young looking man, barely more than in the prime of life. The General is affable, polite, and unassuming, and shares the discomforts of a crowded railroad coach with ordinary travellers. He travels without staff or other attendant. He is first to rise and offer his seat to ladies, if any difficulty occurs in seating them. He talks freely about affairs generally, but had little to say, at the time we write of concerning the army and the country. At one station where an eager crowd were gazing at him he suddenly remarked: “I suppose these people are speculating as to what is on foot now.” He speaks quickly, sometimes brusquely, and with the tone of one who is accustomed to command. His countenance is one indicative of more that and caste than his habitual tolerance and amiability would lead one to expect. He looks the stern soldier. The General is as unostentatious and unassuming in dress as he is in manners. He were a Colonel’s cost, (three stars without the wreath) a good deal faded, blue pantaloons, high top boots, blue cloth and high felt hat, without adornment save a small cord around the crown. Thus appeared our great chieftain, our hero patriot, our Christian soldier, our beloved Robert E Lee, as a railroad traveller. Lynchburg Virginian.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

pacific theater

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

PROMOTED. – The friends of Lieut. HENRY B. SEELY, of the U.S. Navy, will be pleased to learn that he has been promoted to Lieutenant Commander.

An 1857 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, Henry B. Seely “served on the Sumter, South Atlantic blockading squadron, 1861-62; and on the Saranac, Pacific squadron, 1863-65. He was appointed lieutenant-commander, Feb. 21, 1864…” He devoted his entire career to the Navy until “…June, 1892, when he was retired on account of incapacity resulting from long and faithful service.”

The USS Saranac spent the war “protecting American commerce along the coast of California …After the Confederacy had collapsed, Saranac cruised at sea in search of Southern cruiser, CSS Shenandoah, which remained a menace to Union shipping until belatedly learning of the end of the war.”

You can read more about the Pacific Squadron at The California Military Museum. All the gold passing through the Port of San Francisco was a big target.

USS Saranac (1850-1875)  At a harbor mooring.  Courtesy of the Bethlehem Steel Company Archives. Skerrett Collection.  U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

USS Saranac

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Naval Matters, Northern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

more men for Mars

[Abraham Lincoln] ([Cincinnati : Strobridge & Co.,] c1877 Oct. 12.; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-19241)

getting his way as long as the people submit

in the martial month of March

This Democrat paper in the Finger Lakes region sure didn’t wear rose-colored glasses as it responded to President Lincoln’s March 14, 1864 call for 200,000 more men for the military.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

200,000 More Men Wanted.

The President has issued a call for 200,000 more men, in addition to those already called into the field. A war of the magnitude of ours cannot be carried on without blood and treasure, and just so long as the people submit to the sacrifice, just so long will our rulers continue this fierce and bloody civil strife. It seems to us that at no time since the commencement of hostilities has national affairs worn a gloomier aspect than to-day. The recent campaigns, which were sounded with so much zest as certain to seal the doom of the rebellion, have all terminated ingloriously, if not disastrously. Our armies are everywhere confronted with overwhelming forces of the enemy. Privateers are destroying our commerce without molestation, corporations and municipalities are being crippled by taxation, and ruin everywhere stares us in the face. The administration is continually breaking to the national hope the promise it breathes to the national ear. For three weary years the record of the government has been a record of cheering predictions on the one hand, of soul-distressing failures on the other. facts have been misstated, important events have been concealed, falsehoods have been invented, all to deceive a credulous and forbearing people. At no time have our rulers risen to the dignity of Statesmen. While the nation is reeling and tottering like a drunken man, they seem all-absorbed in schemes of power, patronage and partisan success. – They look upon the war, and its train of dire calamities, as the means of perpetuating their own power, regardless of the dangers which threaten the very existence of the nation. What care they for the sufferings of the people, or the condition of the country, so long as the war contributes to their aggrandizement, and ends in the establishment of a despotism, both sure and irrevocable?

Recruiting for the war--scene at the recruiting tents in the park, New York (Illus. in: Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, 1864, March 19, p. 404.; LOC:  LC-USZ62-93555)

recruiting in New York City, Frank Leslie’s March 19, 1864

It is written that in ancient Rome Martius “marked a return to the active life of farming, military campaigning, and sailing.”

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Military Matters, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society, The election of 1864 | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

those slanderous, intriguing Republicans

The following two articles were part of the same clipping in the Civil War notebook at the Seneca Falls public library. The Democrat newspaper criticized some Republican journals for slandering General McClellan and admitted that General Grant might possibly have been able to do good work in his new job as commander of all the U.S. armies, except for meddling Republican politicians in the federal capital.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

The Slander Upon Gen. McClellan.

The Republican papers have recently published and commented upon a very silly story, concerning an interview said to have taken place between Generals MCCLELLAN and LEE, soon after the battle of Antietam. Of course none of these radical journals believed what they published, and the story was only put forth for political affect. It is thus disposed of by the Washington correspondent of the New York Commercial Advertiser, a Republican print:

“The charge that Gen. McClellan had a secret interview with Gen. Lee the night after the battle of Antietam, has proved to be a fiction of a disordered brain. The person who made the astounding statement is a Mr. Francis Waldron, a Marylander, who is a schoolmaster by profession, and who has in years past been somewhat addicted to drink. He has been in the custody of the sergeant-at-arms since Wednesday afternoon, but refuses to make under oath the statement which he has furnished for publication.”

The eagerness with which this story was caught up by the more malignant of the radical press, was the best evidence of its false and slanderous character. In no single instance, however, has it been retracted by them, or reparation made for the utterance of a calumny, at once so vile and infamous.

             __________ . __________

Lieut. Gen. Grant.

By reference to an important army order published elsewhere, it will be observed that GRANT has been made a Lieutenant-General, and assigned to the command of the armies of the United States, with his headquarters at Washington. This is an important movement, and may result satisfactorily to the army and the country. Gen. Grant has the reputation of being a dashing and brilliant officer, and in his new position he may, despite the pernicious influences at Washington, lead our armies to victory. The country will look to him, hopeful and anxious that he may be instrumental in closing this most wretched and exhausting civil war. But we do not believe the intriguing, selfish cabal at Washington will allow him to succeed. The Administration will use him up, as other Generals have been used up, and at the close of the next campaign, Peace and Union will be no nearer at hand than at the commencement of this most disastrous war.

The Report of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War (pages XX-XXI) backed up the story that Francis Waldron was detained because of his refusal to take the oath and testify.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Military Matters, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society, The election of 1864 | Tagged , | Leave a comment