diggin’ for the CSA

This notice has been running in the Dispatch most of the month. The Confederate Niter and Mining Bureau was tasked with supplying necessary minerals and metals to the South’s military. As white men continued to get killed and wounded and diseased, the Bureau had to tap other sources of labor.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch March 24, 1864:

C. S. A, War Department,
Nitre and Mining [B]ureau,

Richmond, Va, March 7, 1864.

Wanted — To hire, 400 Slaves or Free Negroes. Under a recent act of Congress slaves and free negroes can now be impressed for Government work. The Nitre and Mining Bureau need some four hundred hands, and will give the regular Government price–$300, board and clothes.–Parties hiring slaves to this [b]ureau before the order of impressment will be credited with the number so hired in their quota under the call for negroes for any kind of Government service.

Whig, Examiner, Sentinel, Enquiror, and Lynchburg papers copy.

According to Encyclopedia Virginia that $300 was iffy and the slaves often came back to their masters in bad shape:

Still, reimbursement was often slow in coming if it came at all. Government bureaus also regularly impressed slaves at the height of the harvest season and kept them beyond their contracted term of service. Because of poor living and working conditions, many slaves returned to their masters in poor health. Despite protests from slave owners, slave impressments proved critical in allowing the Confederate government to shore up fortifications and keep the war machine churning out arms and ammunition until the very end.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

snowball’s chance in Dalton?

Pretty good in March 1864:

The snowball battle near Dalton, Georgia (by Alfred R. Waud; Published in: Joseph M. Brown's The Mountain Campaign in Georgia, 1890; LOC:  LC-DIG-ppmsca-21383)

“grand mock battle” March 22, 1864

It is written: “On rare occasions it snowed and like children released from school, the troops treated any snowfall as an occasion for play. On March 22 dawn revealed a fresh 5 inches of new snow, and a spontaneous snowball fight broke out all across the camp. The men threw themselfs into the fracas with enthusiasm.”

March 1864 was indeed cold and a time for sham battles for the Confederates in North Georgia. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch march 18, 1864:

Military drill.

Dalton, March16.

Lieut. Gen. Hood had a grand drill of his corps to-day, which, notwithstanding the severity of the weather, was largely attended, especially by general officers. After the drill a sham battle was fought by the entire corps of musketry and artillery. The firing was splendid and the whole affair very imposing, and drew forth the warmest praise from all who witnessed it.

The weather here is excessively cold.

You can see a different image of the snowball fight in The mountain campaigns in Georgia : or, War scenes on the W. & A (page 23).

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

pledge passive allegiance?

After endorsing B.F. Butler for the United States presidency because he was the biggest thief among the candidates, the Richmond Daily Dispatch of March 21, 1864 published the following exchange of letters between General Butler and a Virginia schoolteacher:

Uncle Abe--"Hello! Ben, is that you? Glad to see you!" Butler--"Yes, Uncle Abe. Got through with that New Orleans job. Cleaned them out and scrubbed them up! Any more scrubbing to give out?" (by John McLenan, Harper's Weekly, 1-17-1863; LOC: LC-USZ62-138378 )

Now cleaning up Accomack County

Butler on the oath of allegiance.

–The following correspondence is published as having occurred between Butler and the lady whose name is signed to the first letter:

Locustville, Accomac Co., Va., March10, 1864.

General B. P., Butler:

Sir:

My school has been closed since Christmas, because; as I understood the oath required of us, I could not conscientiously take it. Having heard since that one of your officers explains the oath as meaning simply that we consent to the acts of the United States Government, and pledge passive obedience to the same, I take the liberty of addressing this to you, to ascertain if you so construct the oath. I cannot understand how a woman can “support, protect, and defend the Union,” except by speaking or writing in favor of the present war, which I could never do, because my sympathies are with the South. It by those words you understand merely passive submission, I am ready to take the oath and abide by it sacredly.

Very respectfully,

Mary S. Graves.
Headq’s 18th army Corps.
Department of Virginia and N. C.,

Fortress Monroe, March14, 1864.

My Dear Madam:

–I am truly sorry that my Union officer of mine has attempted to fritter away the effect of the oath of allegiance to the Government of the United States, and to inform you that in means nothing more than passive obedience to the same.

That officer is surely mistaken. The oath of allegiance means fealty, pledge of faith to, love, affection, and reference for, the Government, all comprised in the word patriotism, in its highest and truest sense, which every true American feels for his or her Government.

You say, “I cannot understand how a woman can support, protect, and defend the Union, except by speaking or writing in favor of the present war, which I could never do, because my sympathies are with the South.”

The last phrase, madam, shows why you cannot understand “how a woman can support, protect and defend the Union.”

Were you loyal at heart you would at once understand. The Southern women who are Rebels understand well “how to support, protect and defend” the Confederacy, “with out either speaking or writing.” Some of them act as spies, some smuggle quinine in their under clothes, some smuggle information through the lines in their dresses, some tend sick soldiers for the Confederacy, some get up subscriptions for rebel gunboats.

Perhaps it may all be comprised in the phrase, “where there is a will there is away. “

Now, then, you could “support, protect and defend the Union,” by teaching the scholars of your school to love and reverence the Government, to be proud of their country, to glory in its flag, and to be true to its Constitution. But, as you don’t understand that yourself, you can’t teach it to them; and, therefore, I am glad to learn from your letter that your school has been closed since Christmas, and with my consent, until you change your sentiments and are a loyal woman in heart, it never shall be opened.

I would advise you, madam, forthwith to go where your “sympathies” are. I am only doubtful whether it is my duty to send you.

I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

B. F. Butler,

Major General Commanding.

To Mrs. Mary L. Graves, Locustville, Accomac county, Virginia.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters | Tagged , | Leave a comment

reprieve

Fort Jefferson at the Dry Tortugas

Fort Jefferson at the Dry Tortugas

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

SENTENCED TO BE SHOT. – At a recent court martial, presided over by Capt. Winfield Scott, of the 126th Regiment, private Chas. Audler, of the 108th Regiment, was tried, convicted, and sentenced to be shot, for desertion. The sentence of the Court has been approved by Gen. Meade, and it will be carried into effect on Friday of next week.

Or maybe not:

Charles Audley

sent to the Gulf of Mexico

Captain Winfield Scott would leave the army for a different reason:

Winfield Scott

wounded in May

According to the National Park Service the prisoners at Fort Jefferson in the Dry Tortugas during the Civil War were indeed mostly army deserters.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Military Matters | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

crucible

A southern editorial on how war reveals a person’s true character.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch March 19, 1864:

Demoralization.

We hear a great deal about the demoralizing effects of the war in the United States and in the Confederacy. Doubtless this is true to a certain extent. But, in the main, this war, like all other wars, has simply revealed the native tiger and beast in human nature — not created it. It has, as a French friend of ours used to pronounce the word, “devil-up” the character of the community. The men who are now so openly bad, the monsters who are so bloodthirsty, the speculators who are so ravenous, the tyrants who are so cruel, were always bad, ravenous, bloody, and cruel. The war has simply thrown the broad glare of a policemen’s lantern upon midnight prowlers, rogues, and murderers. It has simply torn the veil from the character of men, and revealed them for the first time to the world, and perhaps to themselves. “Is thy servant a dog, that he should do this thing?” said Hazael, when the man of God predicted the atrocities he should commit in his future career. Yet he was a dog though he knew it not, and so the dogs of the present war were always dogs, possessed of all the vile instincts which the war has simply developed and disclosed to their own eyes and those of the world.–They need not charge the war with their demoralization. The war has only found them out, and made patent the original and inherent corruption of their character.

Washington_and_Lee_U._1948_U.S._stamp.1(Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia was commemorated on its 200th anniversary on November 23, 1948, with a 3-cent postage. The central design is a view of the university, flanked by portraits of generals George Washington and Robert E. Lee.)

But, when we talk of the demoralization of the war, has not the war done something the other way? Has it not revealed good qualities as well as bad, and introduced to the world and to themselves virtuous as well as evil men? Has it not disclosed in the almost unknown Robert E. Lee a closer resemblance to George Washington than we had supposed humanity could ever again furnish? But for the war, Stonewall Jackson might have gone to his grave an obscure professor in the Virginia Military Institute, ignorant, in his saintlike humility, of those wonderful qualities which have filled the world with the glory of his name. And what a host of virtuous and heroic deeds has this war elicited in the citizen soldiery of the South, deeds which are innumerable as the stars of Heaven, and which would never have been seen but for the darkness that has covered the sky! Like the ordeal of the last Judgment, the war has separated the wheat from the tares, the sheep from the goats, the just from the unjust, and revealed all men to themselves and to the world in their real character.
From the same issue:

Gen. R. E. Lee.

Robert_E_Lee_Stain_Glass (Stain glass of history of Robert E Lee in the National Cathedral)

Lee in stained glass at theNational Cathedral

–A friend who travelled with the General on his way down from Gordonsville to Richmond, says he has a very hail and vigorous appearance and looks as though there were a dozen or more good campaigns in him yet. He is a man of fine commanding six feet or upwards in height, and weighs probably the rise of one hundred and eighty. But for his white beard, which he wears entire, but trimmed short, and his silvery hair, he would be comparatively a young looking man, barely more than in the prime of life. The General is affable, polite, and unassuming, and shares the discomforts of a crowded railroad coach with ordinary travellers. He travels without staff or other attendant. He is first to rise and offer his seat to ladies, if any difficulty occurs in seating them. He talks freely about affairs generally, but had little to say, at the time we write of concerning the army and the country. At one station where an eager crowd were gazing at him he suddenly remarked: “I suppose these people are speculating as to what is on foot now.” He speaks quickly, sometimes brusquely, and with the tone of one who is accustomed to command. His countenance is one indicative of more that and caste than his habitual tolerance and amiability would lead one to expect. He looks the stern soldier. The General is as unostentatious and unassuming in dress as he is in manners. He were a Colonel’s cost, (three stars without the wreath) a good deal faded, blue pantaloons, high top boots, blue cloth and high felt hat, without adornment save a small cord around the crown. Thus appeared our great chieftain, our hero patriot, our Christian soldier, our beloved Robert E Lee, as a railroad traveller. Lynchburg Virginian.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

pacific theater

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

PROMOTED. – The friends of Lieut. HENRY B. SEELY, of the U.S. Navy, will be pleased to learn that he has been promoted to Lieutenant Commander.

An 1857 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, Henry B. Seely “served on the Sumter, South Atlantic blockading squadron, 1861-62; and on the Saranac, Pacific squadron, 1863-65. He was appointed lieutenant-commander, Feb. 21, 1864…” He devoted his entire career to the Navy until “…June, 1892, when he was retired on account of incapacity resulting from long and faithful service.”

The USS Saranac spent the war “protecting American commerce along the coast of California …After the Confederacy had collapsed, Saranac cruised at sea in search of Southern cruiser, CSS Shenandoah, which remained a menace to Union shipping until belatedly learning of the end of the war.”

You can read more about the Pacific Squadron at The California Military Museum. All the gold passing through the Port of San Francisco was a big target.

USS Saranac (1850-1875)  At a harbor mooring.  Courtesy of the Bethlehem Steel Company Archives. Skerrett Collection.  U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

USS Saranac

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Naval Matters, Northern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

more men for Mars

[Abraham Lincoln] ([Cincinnati : Strobridge & Co.,] c1877 Oct. 12.; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-19241)

getting his way as long as the people submit

in the martial month of March

This Democrat paper in the Finger Lakes region sure didn’t wear rose-colored glasses as it responded to President Lincoln’s March 14, 1864 call for 200,000 more men for the military.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

200,000 More Men Wanted.

The President has issued a call for 200,000 more men, in addition to those already called into the field. A war of the magnitude of ours cannot be carried on without blood and treasure, and just so long as the people submit to the sacrifice, just so long will our rulers continue this fierce and bloody civil strife. It seems to us that at no time since the commencement of hostilities has national affairs worn a gloomier aspect than to-day. The recent campaigns, which were sounded with so much zest as certain to seal the doom of the rebellion, have all terminated ingloriously, if not disastrously. Our armies are everywhere confronted with overwhelming forces of the enemy. Privateers are destroying our commerce without molestation, corporations and municipalities are being crippled by taxation, and ruin everywhere stares us in the face. The administration is continually breaking to the national hope the promise it breathes to the national ear. For three weary years the record of the government has been a record of cheering predictions on the one hand, of soul-distressing failures on the other. facts have been misstated, important events have been concealed, falsehoods have been invented, all to deceive a credulous and forbearing people. At no time have our rulers risen to the dignity of Statesmen. While the nation is reeling and tottering like a drunken man, they seem all-absorbed in schemes of power, patronage and partisan success. – They look upon the war, and its train of dire calamities, as the means of perpetuating their own power, regardless of the dangers which threaten the very existence of the nation. What care they for the sufferings of the people, or the condition of the country, so long as the war contributes to their aggrandizement, and ends in the establishment of a despotism, both sure and irrevocable?

Recruiting for the war--scene at the recruiting tents in the park, New York (Illus. in: Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, 1864, March 19, p. 404.; LOC:  LC-USZ62-93555)

recruiting in New York City, Frank Leslie’s March 19, 1864

It is written that in ancient Rome Martius “marked a return to the active life of farming, military campaigning, and sailing.”

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Military Matters, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society, The election of 1864 | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

those slanderous, intriguing Republicans

The following two articles were part of the same clipping in the Civil War notebook at the Seneca Falls public library. The Democrat newspaper criticized some Republican journals for slandering General McClellan and admitted that General Grant might possibly have been able to do good work in his new job as commander of all the U.S. armies, except for meddling Republican politicians in the federal capital.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in March 1864:

The Slander Upon Gen. McClellan.

The Republican papers have recently published and commented upon a very silly story, concerning an interview said to have taken place between Generals MCCLELLAN and LEE, soon after the battle of Antietam. Of course none of these radical journals believed what they published, and the story was only put forth for political affect. It is thus disposed of by the Washington correspondent of the New York Commercial Advertiser, a Republican print:

“The charge that Gen. McClellan had a secret interview with Gen. Lee the night after the battle of Antietam, has proved to be a fiction of a disordered brain. The person who made the astounding statement is a Mr. Francis Waldron, a Marylander, who is a schoolmaster by profession, and who has in years past been somewhat addicted to drink. He has been in the custody of the sergeant-at-arms since Wednesday afternoon, but refuses to make under oath the statement which he has furnished for publication.”

The eagerness with which this story was caught up by the more malignant of the radical press, was the best evidence of its false and slanderous character. In no single instance, however, has it been retracted by them, or reparation made for the utterance of a calumny, at once so vile and infamous.

             __________ . __________

Lieut. Gen. Grant.

By reference to an important army order published elsewhere, it will be observed that GRANT has been made a Lieutenant-General, and assigned to the command of the armies of the United States, with his headquarters at Washington. This is an important movement, and may result satisfactorily to the army and the country. Gen. Grant has the reputation of being a dashing and brilliant officer, and in his new position he may, despite the pernicious influences at Washington, lead our armies to victory. The country will look to him, hopeful and anxious that he may be instrumental in closing this most wretched and exhausting civil war. But we do not believe the intriguing, selfish cabal at Washington will allow him to succeed. The Administration will use him up, as other Generals have been used up, and at the close of the next campaign, Peace and Union will be no nearer at hand than at the commencement of this most disastrous war.

The Report of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War (pages XX-XXI) backed up the story that Francis Waldron was detained because of his refusal to take the oath and testify.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Military Matters, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society, The election of 1864 | Tagged , | Leave a comment

pharisees

When I read that War is Disunion in a local Democrat editorial, I thought, wouldn’t a successful secession be disunion? Here a Republican-leaning editorial put the blame squarely south of Mason-Dixon, with a little helpo from northern doughfaces and copperheads

From The New-York Times March 13, 1864:

The Morals of the Rebellion.

If there is anything disgusting anywhere, it is the pharisaic assumption with which the rebels occasionally take to themselves all Christian excellencies. Here are a parcel of men who have raised a causeless revolt against a Government which had been nothing but beneficent to them; who have rebelled against free institutions in the interest of Slavery, the “sum of all villianies;” who began their work by robberies the most gigantic, frauds the most dishonest, breaches of faith the most atrocious; who have plunged a nation into civil war and shed oceans of the best blood of the land; who have beggared thousands of families, brought grief and shame into thousands more; who have in the name of liberty perpetrated the most atrocious crimes; who have been guilty of barbarities worthy of savages and utterly innumerable; who have shrunk from no oppression, refrained from no crime; whose whole career has been one of treachery, broken pledges, robbery, extortion and cruelty; and yet every now and then one of the gang will descant upon the purity of their motives, the nobleness and magnanimity of their actions, the glory of their deeds, and the innumerable merits of their cause.

One of the most remarkable displays of this kind is the following from the Richmond Whig:

“If our cause be just, it must triumph. If it be not just, then the greater portion of the enlightened world is deceived. On moral grounds the justice of our cause has been vindicated by the ablest intellects in Europe and by the best men at the North. England, the mother of Abolitionism, has sustained us; France, as thoroughly Anti-Slavery as England, though, not like her, a propagandist, has sustained us. FERNANDO WOOD, FRANKLIN PIERCE, SEYMOUR of Connecticut, sustain us in the moral issue at least. Thus sustained, we shall indeed lack manhood if we fail to meet this last hour of trial bravely and hopefully.”

What idea of “moral grounds” or a “moral issue” can this rebel Whig have, when he talks in this way? What sense can he have of what goodness is, if he calls SEYMOUR, PIERCE and FERNANDO WOOD, the “best men at the North?” England and France have helped sustain the rebellion, it is true, but it has been in spite of its immorality, because they thought it was their interest, and they would have sustained it ten-fold more, were it not that they dared not so insult the moral sense of the civilized world. How hard up this rebel must be for support when he has to grub for it in such a mire as this. Only think of it! The Richmond Whig rejoices in the support of FERNANDO WOOD “on the moral issue.” Was there ever such a sight? A polecat rejoicing in the moral support of a humble bug! and then the creature talks about “manhood!” Faugh!

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Northern Society, Southern Society | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

winter break

Apparently Old Man Winter put a crimp in old man Sumpter’s plans today.

Winter--Fifth Avenue (1892) (by Alfred Stieglitz; LOC:  LC-USZ62-96557)

(Winter–Fifth Avenue (1892) Library of Congress)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment