no relief

Secretary of State William H. Seward was not going to let the British distribute aid to rebels in Union prison camps. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 12, 1864:

The British Relief Fund for Confederate prisoners — Seward Refuses to Allow its Distribution.

Charles_Francis_Adams

Mr. Adams received instructions from Secretary Seward

Lincoln, on Thursday, sent a message to the Senate in reply to Mr. Sumner’s resolution calling upon him to furnish any information in his possession relative to a proposition of British subjects to give aid to the rebellion. Lord Wharncliffe informs Mr. Adams that the Liverpool Bazaar produced about £17,000, and asks permission for an accredited agent to visit the military prisons within the Northern States and distribute aid to their inmates. He denies that any political aid is aimed at, or any imputation that Confederate prisoners are deprived of such attentions as the ordinary rules enjoin. He says:

“The issue of the great contest will not be determined by individual suffering, be it greater or less; and you, whose family name is interwoven with American history, cannot view with indifference the suffering of American citizens, whatever their State or opinions.”

Mr. Adams replied that it has never been the desire of the Government to treat with unnecessary or vindictive severity “any of the misguided individual parties in this deplorable rebellion who have fallen into its hands in the regular course of the war, and that he should greatly rejoice if the effects of such sympathy could be extended to ministering to their mental ailment as well as their bodily suffering, thus contributing to put an end to a struggle which otherwise is too likely to be only procrastinated by their English sympathizers.” Mr. Seward replies as follows to the application received through Mr. Adams:

Department of State, Washington, December 5, 1864.

Sir:

I have received your dispatch of the 18th of November, No. 807, together with the papers therein mentioned, viz: a copy of a letter which was addressed to you on the 12th of November last by Lord Wharncliffe, and a copy of your answer to that letter. You will now inform Lord Wharncliffe that permission for an agent of the committee described by him to visit the insurgents detained in the military prisons of the United States and distribute among them seventeen thousand pounds of British gold is disallowed. Here it is expected that your correspondence with Lord Wharncliffe will end. That correspondence will necessarily become public.

On reading it, the American public will be well aware that while the United States have ample means for the support of prisoners as well as for every exigency of the war in which they are engaged, the insurgents who have rushed into that coalition are suffering no privations that appeal for relief to charity either at home or abroad. The American public will be likely to reflect that the sum thus insidiously tendered in the name of humanity constitutes no large portion of the profits which its contributors may be justly supposed to have derived from the insurgents by exchanging with them arms and munitions of war for the coveted productions of immoral and enervating slave labor.

The pending conflict (Entered . . . 1863 by Oliver Evans Woods . . . Pennsylvania. Herline & Hensel, Lith. 632 Chestnut St. Phila.; LOC: LC-USZ62-17728)

John Bull holding clubs for rebeldom

Nor will any portion of the American people be disposed to regard the sum thus ostentatiously offered for the relief of captured insurgents as a too generous equivalent for the devastation and dissolution which a civil war, promoted and protracted by British subjects, has spread throughout the States which before were eminently prosperous and happy. Finally, in view of this last officious intervention in our domestic affairs, the American people can hardly fail to recall the warning of the Father of our Country, directed against two great and intimately connected public dangers, namely, sectional faction and foreign intrigue.

I do not think the insurgents have become debased, although they have sadly wandered from the ways of loyalty and patriotism. I think that, in common with all our countrymen, they will rejoice in being saved by their considerate and loyal Government from the grave insult which Lord Wharncliffe and his associates, in their zeal for the overthrow of the United States, have prepared for the victims of this unnatural and hopeless rebellion.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,

William H. Seward.

You can read all about the The Confederate Bazaar at Liverpool at American Civil War Round Table UK and get another look at Mr. Seward’s letter to Charles Francis Adams at Google Books[1]. An explanation of the political cartoon appears at the Library of Congress

Secretary Seward had been dealing with the British throughout the war, as can be seen by this cartoon regarding the Trent Affair:

The great surrender America surrenders the great commissioners - England surrenders her great pretensions - Jeff. Davis surrenders his great expectations. (New-York : Published by E. Anthony, 501 Broadway, 1862.; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-35499)

Trent Affair

Trent Affair

Trent Affair

  1. [1]McPherson, Edward The political history of the United States of America, during the great rebellion …. Philp & Solomons, 1865. Print. page 268.
Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Civil War prisons, Foreign Relations, Lincoln Administration | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

grand idea

Actually, over two grand

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1864:

Arrested for Forgery.

Lieut. H.C. Furniss, of Waterloo, is now under arrest at Elmira, charged with forging the name of Provost Marshal Knapp, of this district, to certificates of muster. These forged certificates to the amount of $2,200, were presented to, and paid, by the Supervisor of Fayette. Lieut. Furniss was arrested at the oil regions of Pennsylvania, and brought on to Elmira, where he will be tried by the military authorities.

I have not seen how the trial worked out. An undated clipping at the New York State Military Museum lauds Lieut. Furniss for his recruiting skills for the short-lived 11th New York Artillery Regiment:

11th Heavy Artillery.
We are pleased to learn that Lieut. H. C. Furniss is doing well in recruiting men. He has already recruited some sixteen men, and has been to work about three weeks. He is an industrious goahead young man, and has a good military education. He has passed an examination as to his capability for an officer, and gave good satisfaction. Young men could not do better than to call upon the Lieut. and see him before going abroad to enlist. This will be a fine regiment, and will not go out of the State. The Lieut. has an official notice that the regiment will be raised to garrison the forts in New York Harbor.—

Oil City, Venango Co. Pa.

on the lam in the PA oil region? (“Oil City, Venango Co. Pa.” c.6Nov1864.Library of Congress(

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Military Matters, Northern Society | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“true olive branch”

The December 10, 1864 issue of Harper’s Weekly (at Son of the South was impressed by General Sherman’s operations in Georgia. Here’s an excerpt:

SHERMAN’S MARCH.

THE campaign of General SHERMAN is striking and daring, but not more so than his advance from Chattanooga, of which it is a continuation. At Atlanta, with a slender line of railroad nearly two hundred miles long, exposed to the forays of the rebel cavalry, his position was uncertain. The advantages were not balanced by the risks. He has therefore made it useless for either party, and destroying as he goes, he carries a line of fire straight across the surface of the rebel section, cutting a terrible swath to the sea.

General SHERMAN does not play at war. ” War is cruelty,” he says, ” and you can not refine it,” and he believes that they who have brought war upon the country will justly feel its sharpest edge. Yet he only is wise who sees in SHERMAN’S flashing sword the true olive branch. When the deluded Southern people feel that the Government is strong enough to pierce their section where it will; that the national armies can march and countermarch at their pleasure; that the shrewdest plans of their own Generals are outwitted and baffled; and those Generals perceive that they have lost their supreme military advantage of interior lines, a moral victory is won. …

How Sherman's boys fixed the railroad

“How Sherman’s boys fixed the railroad” (Library of Congress)

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Military Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“virtual defeat”

Field works at Franklin, Tenn., occupied by the 23d and 4th corps during engagement of Nov. 30th 1864, Maj. Gen. J. M. Schofield, comdg.  (1864; LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/2003627083/)

South is up at Franklin

A Democrat-leaning publication in upstate New York was skeptical about claims of a Union victory at the Battle of Franklin. From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1864:

The Battle at Franklin.

The battle of Franklin, Tenn., on the 30th ult., between the Federal forces under Thomas, and the Confederates under the Hood, resulted as we predicted last week, in the virtual defeat of our army. It was a battle forced by the Confederates, and the falling back of our forces to Nashville, a distance of twenty miles, during the night and before hostilities had fairly ceased, bears us out in this assertion. The Confederates followed up their success, and are now besieging Nashville. The first report placed their loss at six thousand, and ours at only six hundred. A second report brings the rebel loss down to two thousand, and owns a loss on our side of fifteen hundred. If the truth could be known we venture to say that one side suffered quite as much as the other.

Since Gen. Hood’s army crossed the Tennessee river, our forces have gradually retreated. The enemy has driven us from Decatur, Huntsville, Shelbyville and Pulaski. At Columbia, Hood attacked and defeated our army, and then Thomas retreated across the Duck river and made a stand at Franklin, a strongly fortified town. Here he was again attacked with great impetuosity by Hood, and here he again retreated. This, in brief, is the result of the campaign in Tennessee. Does anyone believe if the rebels were as “disastrously” defeated as reported, they would now be laying siege to Nashville?

Battle of Franklin. November 30, 1864-Union (Gen. Schofield) ... Conf. (Gen. Hood (Chicago : Kurz & Allison, Art Publishers, 1891; LOC: LC-DIG-pga-01852)

too good to be true

That’s virtually the same question a Southern newspaper asked. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 5, 1864:

Monday morning…December 6 [5], 1864.

From the Yankee accounts of their victory at Franklin over Hood, it must have been the strangest victory on record, except that gained by Banks over Dick Taylor last spring. It seems that Hood attacked Schofield works at 4 o’clock, nearly sunset, was at first victorious, carried the lines of the Yankees, and was then outflanked and beaten so badly that but for night coming on he would have been annihilated. In the little time that elapsed between 4 o’clock and dark, on the 1st of December, he lost six thousand men, killed and wounded, and one thousand prisoners! All this is truly wonderful! But the courtesy and urbanity of Schofield and Thomas are more marvellous than anything else.–After having defeated Hood so terribly, their politeness did not allow them to stay on the field and witness his humiliation the next day. So, in the night, they fell back to within four miles of Nashville, where they say they hold a splendid position. There they assert that the crowning battle is to be fought, and that Thomas is very confident. They had apologized before for falling back to Franklin. They said they did so because it was such an admirable position. Now they have abandoned it, after having gained a splendid victory!

Portrait of Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield, officer of the Federal Army (Between 1860 and 1865; LOC:  LC-DIG-cwpb-05934)

the urbane General Schofield

These lies are too gross for belief. Our opinion is, that Thomas has been badly beaten, and has fallen back because he cannot help it.

The numbers lost at Franklin was adjusted in another article from a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1864:

OUR LOSS AT THE BATTLE OF FRANKLIN. – Our loss in the battle of Franklin turns out to have been much larger than at first reported. It was over two thousand in killed wounded and missing. We lost nearly as many prisoners as we took – that is, about a thousand. This loss occurred when our lines were broken, early in the battle.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Military Matters, Northern Politics During War | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Samuel Oliver

Apparently 150 years ago this month the body of a soldier arrived home before word of his death.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1864:

DEATH OF A SOLDIER. – The remains of Corporal Samuel Oliver of Canoga arrived her on Thursday morning. He was among the last recruits from this County, and belonged to the 15th. N.Y.V. Engineers. We understand his family knew nothing of his sickness or death until the arrival of his remains for interment. He leaves a wife and one child to mourn his sudden death.

Samuel Oliver

three months a soldier

City Point, Virginia. General Hospital (1864 Sept.; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpb-04119)

“City Point, Virginia. General Hospital” September 1864 (Library of Congress)

According to the New York State Military Museum 124 memebers of the 15th New York Engineer Regiment died due to disease during its four year service; five members died as a direct result of battle.

Officers of 15th New York Engineers (photographed between 1861 and 1865, printed between 1880 and 1889; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-34209)

Officers of 15th New York Engineers, sometime during the war

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Military Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

behavioral economics

And General Sherman (hey, it’s December 1864).

US-$1-LT-1862-Fr-16c (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US-$1-LT-1862-Fr-16c.jpg)

new job for Mr. Chase

On the same day that President Lincoln nominated Salmon P. Chase to serve as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court he presented Congress with his annual message. You can read about Mr. Lincoln’s comprehensive report at Civil War Daily Gazette. Here are a couple cut-outs from the message. After reporting the numbers on the national debt Mr. Lincoln urged higher taxes and a greater distribution of the federal public debt to as many citizens as possible:

… For the actual receipts and disbursements for the first quarter and the estimated receipts and disbursements for the three remaining quarters of the current fiscal year, and the general operations of the Treasury in detail, I refer you to the report of the Secretary of the Treasury. I concur with him in the opinion that the proportion of moneys required to meet the expenses consequent upon the war derived from taxation should be still further increased; and I earnestly invite your attention to this subject to the end that there be such additional legislation as shall be required to meet the just expectations of the Secretary.

The public debt on the first day of July last, as appears by the books of the Treasury, amounted to $1,740,690,489.49. Probably, should the war continue for another year, that amount may be increased by not far from $500,000,000. Held, as it is, for the most part by our own people, it has become a substantial branch of national, though private, property. For obvious reasons the more nearly this property can be distributed among all the people the better. To favor such general distribution, greater inducements to become owners might, perhaps, with good effect and without injury be presented to persons of limited means. With this view I suggest whether it might not be both competent and expedient for Congress to provide that a limited amount of some future issue of public securities might be held by any bona fide purchaser exempt from taxation and from seizure for debt, under such restrictions and limitations as might be necessary to guard against abuse of so important a privilege. This would enable every prudent person to set aside a small annuity against a possible day of want.

Privileges like these would render the possession of such securities to the amount limited most desirable to every person of small means who might be able to save enough for the purpose. The great advantage of citizens being creditors as well as debtors with relation to the public debt is obvious. Men readily perceive that they can not be much oppressed by a debt which they owe to themselves. …

People will be happier paying taxes so they can pay themselves back. The President’s mention of a “small annuity against a possible day of want” seems to understand the value of Social Security, although he would encourage it on a more voluntary basis.

Mr. Lincoln summarized war operations:

The war continues. Since the last annual message all the important lines and positions then occupied by our forces have been maintained and our arms have steadily advanced, thus liberating the regions left in rear, so that Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, and parts of other States have again produced reasonably fair crops.

The most remarkable feature in the military operations of the year is General Sherman’s attempted march of three hundred miles directly through the insurgent region. It tends to show a great increase of our relative strength that our General-in-Chief should feel able to confront and hold in check every active force of the enemy, and yet to detach a well-appointed large army to move on such an expedition. The result not yet being known, conjecture in regard to it is not here indulged.

Important movements have also occurred during the year to the effect of molding society for durability in the Union. Although short of complete success, it is much in the right direction that twelve thousand citizens in each of the States of Arkansas and Louisiana have organized loyal State governments, with free constitutions, and are earnestly struggling to maintain and administer them. The movements in the same direction more extensive though less definite in Missouri, Kentucky, and Tennessee, should not be overlooked. But Maryland presents the example of complete success. Maryland is secure to liberty and union for all the future. The genius of rebellion will no more claim Maryland. Like another foul spirit being driven out, it may seek to tear her, but it will woo her no more.

[Atlanta, Ga. Gen. William T. Sherman on horseback at Federal Fort No. 7]; by Geore N. Barnard,1864; LOC:

where will he come out at?

The President’s message to Congress contained 5800 words; he didn’t have quite as much to say to a group of serenaders, although he still talked up General Sherman.

From The Papers And Writings Of Abraham Lincoln, Volume Seven:

RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, DECEMBER 6, 1864.

FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:—I believe I shall never be old enough to speak without embarrassment when I have nothing to talk about. I have no good news to tell you, and yet I have no bad news to tell. We have talked of elections until there is nothing more to say about them. The most interesting news now we have is from Sherman. We all know where he went in at, but I can’t tell where he will come out at. I will now close by proposing three cheers for General Sherman and his army.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

capital shells?

Richmond Defenses 1864 (by Robert Knox Sneden; LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/gvhs01.vhs00236/)

ready for a shelling? (Richmond defenses 1864 http://www.loc.gov/item/gvhs01.vhs00236/)

150 years ago today editors in Richmond mentioned that the Union army might be sending some incendiary shells their way in the near future. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 5, 1864:

The preparations for shelling Richmond — experiments with the incendiary shell — news from below the city.

The Yankees seem to be preparing for the experiment of shelling Richmond.–The shells are invented by A. Berney, and contain the celebrated Greek fire, which has been tried at Charleston. A letter to the Tribune, speaking of the experiments with this projectile, says:

The day before yesterday some highly interesting experiments were made from Fort Brady, at the left of our lines on this side of the James, with an incendiary shell, which. I believe, bears the name of its inventor, Mr. A. Berney, of the Greek fire notoriety. One hundred pound shells were fired from our battery, under charge of Captain H. H. Pierce, of the First Connecticut artillery. Five frame houses, distance nearly a mile, were successively fired and burned to the ground. The cellar of one of these had, it appeared, been used as a sort of magazine, as shells exploded extensively during its conflagration.

"Fort Brady, Va. Battery of Parrott guns manned by Company C, 1st Connecticut Heavy Artillery" (1864; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpb-03598)

“Fort Brady, Va. Battery of Parrott guns manned by Company C, 1st Connecticut Heavy Artillery” 1864 (Library of Congress)

To-day another trial was undertaken. A few ordinary shells were sent over to the “Johnnies,” however, with the compliments of Captain Pierce, and one of the incendiary fellows was exploded in closer proximity to a large house in the rebel lines, in full view of our battery, but not near enough to it to accomplish its ignition. We succeeded, however, in drawing the fire from all of the three batteries which the rebels have been so busily engaged in planting across the James for some weeks past, twelve guns in all, and they poured the shell very lively, for near two hours, into Fort Brady. We have elicited this fact: that they have 7 and 8 inch Brooks’s guns, 10 inch columbiads and Whitworth guns mounted over there, and that is about all, except that we can fire any building, or collection of buildings, which is within range of our guns.

In this connection, it is interesting to state that every house in Petersburg lies in easy reach of our works, and that we also posses guns which are able, from our advanced position, to reach the very heart of the city of Richmond. It will thus be seen what we can do, and it may be my province hereafter to state either what we will do, or have already done, toward causing the rebels to feel the hardships of war.

Rich-Pete December 1864 ("Map of the neighbourhood of Richmond and Petersburg, Virginia. " Shows confederate and federal positions as of December, 1864. LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/97684234/)

“Map of the neighbourhood of Richmond and Petersburg, Virginia.” 1864 (http://www.loc.gov/item/97684234/)

The other day a distinguished party called on General Butler, consisting of General Grant, Meade, Crawford, Warren, and a number of stars of lesser magnitude, and while here of course paid a visit to Dutch gap. While there a shell sent by the rebels exploded so near that fragments of one of them fell in the midst of the party, but luckily without injury to any one of its distinguished members.

The iron clads in the James river have been provided with a large-sized locomotive lantern, which is placed on the bow; and its rays, thrown ahead on the water, enable the men to see if the rebels send down infernal machines, or make any attempts to board them.

The map of the Richmond – Petersburg area “Shows confederate and federal positions as of December, 1864.” The federal positions are in red and Fort Brady would be near Cox’s Landing and Dutch Gap on the northeastern side of the James. Fort Brady is currently part of a Richmond Battlefield Tour from the National Park Service: “Fort Brady, a well-preserved fortification on the James River, was built by Union engineers after the battles of late September, 1864. It kept Confederate gunboats bottled up to the north, and anchored the Union line that extended to Fort Harrison and beyond”.

Fort Brady, Va. Entrance to magazine (1864; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpb-02208)

“Fort Brady, Va. Entrance to magazine” 1864 (Library of Congress)

You can read about how the powder magazine was constructed here.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters, Siege of Petersburg | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“We usually take five at a load”

From The New-York Times December 4, 1864:

HOSPITAL SCENES.; How the Soldiers Are Buried How Their Remains May be Recovered. Correspondence of the New-York Times. UNITED STATES GENERAL HOSPITAL, FORTRESS MONROE, Va., Thursday, Nov. 17, 1864. BURYING THE DEAD. EXHUMING THE DEAD.

Taps and the Dead March "The Post Band, Fort Monroe, Va., December, 1864"

the Dead March and a lively patriotic air (“The Post Band, Fort Monroe, Va., December, 1864” – Library of Congress)

When a soldier dies, his body is washed, enshrouded in a clean shirt and drawers, and with naked hands and feet, is carried on a stretcher by the nurses to the dead-house and put in a plain, red coffin. The soldier’s name, company and regiment are painted on the under side of the coffin lid, to identify the deceased in case of exhuming. At the hour appointed, the escort, drum corps, dead-cart, pall-bearers, and the Chaplain, all being assembled, the funeral begins by placing the encoffined dead in the cart, each one receiving the regular dead salute of a three-fold rapping of the drums and the shouldering and presenting of arms by the escort. We usually take five at a load, all covered over with the glorious old flag they died to honor and defend. All ready, with a slow step, graced with the solemn notes of the “Dead March,” of fife and drum, we march to the graveyard, and with solemn silence consign them to the tomb.

We usually bury eight or ten at once — sometimes not more than five. When the last coffin is let down, all baring their heads, the Chaplain reads an appropriate passage of Scripture, makes a few remarks, often speaking of the dying words and requests of the deceased, and closes with prayer — and the escort, having fired three vollies over their graves, we leave them.

Retiring, the band plays a lively, patriotic air, and the solemn scene is all over, usually without a tear being shed, except when a relative is present.

Fort Monroe and Hampton March 1862

a graveyard at Hampton mapped – March 1862

The graveyard at Hampton, where all the soldiers who have died in Divisions 1, 2 and 4, of this General Hospital, now contains some 1,600 graves, is kept very neat and clean. A neat head-board, with the name, company and regiment of each soldier, and the date of his death, marks the spot where his mortal remains lie.

For the information of friends at home, we state that, to exhume a body, you must get a metallic case and a permit from Dr. E. MCCLELLAN, Surgeon in charge, which can be done by applying by letter at his office here, if you don’t wish to come down, and he will have the body exhumed and sent home by Adams’ Express Company. The cost of case and exhuming is $30; or, you can write to the Express Company at Fortress Monroe, and they will exhume the body and send it wherever desired. A great many bodies nave been taken up this Fall. They go away daily, but not half as fast as we put them there. Such a grave-yard presents a solemn sight. Here lie the old, the young, the educated, the rich and the poor patriotic soldiers. The father recently exhumed the remains of his son, who left a fortune of $50,000, but who sacrificed his life for his country.

Preparations are making to neatly inclose this large depository of the patriotic dead. A.S. B.

The Hampton National Cemetery website says:

The great number of sick and wounded soldiers during the Civil War resulted in numerous military hospitals being set up near battle sites. A 1,800-bed military hospital was established at Fort Monroe, near Hampton. Although the Fort Monroe hospital was better staffed and organized than many Civil War hospitals, the mortality rate was high. Consequently, burials at Hampton National Cemetery included many soldiers who died at Fort Monroe and other military hospitals in the vicinity. Although burials began at the cemetery in 1862, it was not classified by the U.S. Government as a national cemetery until 1866. The legal transfer of 4.749 acres for the cemetery did not occur until 1868.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Military Matters, Northern Society | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Abe’s Cornerstone

Abraham_Lincoln_2 (http://www.wpclipart.com/American_History/civil_war/famous_people/Lincoln/Abraham_Lincoln_framed.png.html)

pondering religion

The Union must be preserved and slavery is wrong.

Nevertheless, the president still released two rebel prisoners.

From The Papers And Writings Of Abraham Lincoln, Volume Seven:

MEMORANDUM,
DECEMBER 3, 1864.

On Thursday of last week, two ladies from Tennessee came before the President, asking the release of their husbands held as prisoners of war at Johnson’s Island. They were put off until Friday, when they came again, and were again put off until Saturday. At each of the interviews one of the ladies urged that her husband was a religious man, and on Saturday the President ordered the release of the prisoners, when he said to this lady: “You say your husband is a religious man; tell him when you meet him, that I say I am not much of a judge of religion, but that, in my opinion, the religion that sets men to rebel and fight against their own government, because, as they think, that government does not sufficiently help some men to eat their bread in the sweat of other men’s faces, is not the sort of religion upon which people can get to heaven.”

A. LINCOLN.

President Lincoln is often quoted as saying, “Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God’s side, for God is always right”

View of Johnson's Island, near Sandusky City, O.  (1865; LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/99447489/)

View of Johnson’s Island, near Sandusky City, O.

I’m assuming President Lincoln is talking about slavery here because I sure am thankful that others have hired me to help them and me eat our bread by some honest sweat.

The image of Abraham Lincoln is from wpclipart

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

vandals?

A Democratic-leaning paper in upstate New York was not quite so enamored of total war in Georgia as The New-York Times appeared to be in its Thanksgiving day issue. Presumably the rebels would soon resist the Union army with a strong force. Also, wouldn’t Georgians kind of resent the destruction of their state?

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1864:

Gen. Sherman’s Movements.

The news from Sherman’s army, through rebel sources, is important, although somewhat conflicting. Thus far, it seems, he has met with no serious opposition by armed forces in his march through Georgia towards the Atlantic coast, though his way has been somewhat obstructed by rebel cavalry. It is, however, evident that the rebels are concentrating a powerful force to give him battle. The Baltimore correspondent of the World says that Sherman’s movement was fully anticipated by the rebel authorities, and that Gen. Beauregard has been collecting a force, and will in due time, and at the proper point, give him battle.

The Governors of South Carolina and Georgia have made a call for all male citizens in their respective States, between the ages of 16 and 45, for immediate service.

A most desperate effort, therefore, will be made by the rebels to defeat and destroy Gen. Sherman and his victorious army. – Time alone will decide the result. The wholesale destruction of public and private property by Sherman must so outrage the people that every man and boy that can shoulder a musket will at once join the rebel army.

The Richmond papers say that the invasion of Georgia and the vandalism of Sherman will cure the Georgians of their foolish love for the old Union, or its restoration, and make them unyielding friends of the Southern Confederacy.

Sherman's march to the sea (drawn by F.O.C. Darley. c.1886; LOC: LC-USZ62-116520)

curing Georgians of their love for old Union

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Military Matters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment