Accidents Happen

frontispiece from The Life Of Abraham Lincoln, by Ward H. Lamon at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/40977/40977-h/40977-h.htm

From Project Gutenberg (Volume VI):

CONGRATULATIONS TO THE ARMY OF THE POTOMAC
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON,

December 22, 1862.
TO THE ARMY OF THE POTOMAC:

I have just read your general’s report of the battle of Fredericksburg. Although you were not successful, the attempt was not an error, nor the failure other than accident. The courage with which you, in an open field, maintained the contest against an intrenched foe, and the consummate skill and success with which you crossed and recrossed the river in the face of the enemy, show that you possess all the qualities of a great army, which will yet give victory to the cause of the country and of popular government.

Condoling with the mourners for the dead, and sympathizing with the severely wounded, I congratulate you that the number of both is comparatively so small.

I tender to you, officers and soldiers, the thanks of the nation.
A. LINCOLN.

You can read General Burnside’s account of the battle in the January 3, 1863 issue of Harper’s Weekly hosted at Son of the South. Of the approximately 9,000 Union wounded, “The surgeons report a much larger proportion of slight wounds than usual, 1632 only being treated in hospitals.”

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg, Lincoln Administration | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“needlessly, wickedly sacrificed”

fredericksburg-cartoon Harper's Weekly, January 3, 1863

COLUMBIA. “Where are my 15,000 Sons—murdered at Fredericksburg?” LINCOLN. “This reminds me of a little Joke—” COLUMBIA. “Go tell your Joke AT SPRINGFIELD!!”

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1862:

Again Defeated.

Bringing the wounded into Fredericksburg in the afternoon--of Saturday (by Arthur Lumley,  1862 ca. December; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-20785)

wetting Virginia with their blood

What is to be said in this week of the nation’s agony? What word is sufficient in these days red with battle and hot with the flush of conflicting passions? Our arms have sustained another defeat, – more disastrous and ignominious than any which we have heretofore suffered.

The Grand Army under BURNSIDE in its triumphal march across the Rappahannock were but marching into the very jaws of death, as the sequel has most clearly demonstrated. The conspiracy which might have been crushed a twelve-month ago has now grown into proportions which overshadow the continent and threaten to destroy the nation. – And this because incapacity, treachery and weakness rule at Washington.

abraham-lincoln-cartoon harper's Weekly, January 3, 1863


THOSE GUILLOTINES.—A LITTLE INCIDENT AT THE WHITE HOUSE. SERVANT. “If ye plase, Sir, them Gilliteens has arove.”
MR. LINCOLN. “All right, MICHAEL.—NOW, Gentlemen, will you be kind enough to step out in the Back Yard?”

The magnitude of the defeat on the heights of Fredericksburg cannot be fully comprehended, and it is sickening to contemplate the horrors of that terrible struggle. From an early hour until nightfall the slaughter went on without cessation, until the ruin of the Grand Army was complete, and well nigh twenty thousand brave and noble souls wet the hill sides of Virginia with their blood. Never was heroism more sublimely displayed, – never an army more needlessly, wickedly sacrificed. The blundering strategy and the incompetent generalship that hurled our forces against the impregnable intrenchments of the enemy should be characterized and denounced as indiscriminate murder slaughter, and the authors, whoever they may be, execrated and driven from the presence of God and man. We have no patience to speak in milder terms. Too many of the noblest and bravest of the land have already been slaughtered in this wicked and unrighteous war; and too many, alas, have perished through the combined stupidity and criminal incapacity of ABRAHAM LINCOLN, HENRY W. HALLECK and EDWIN M. STANTON. They have too long trifled with the very existence of the nation. When the rebellion was about to be crushed they interposed, defeated the plans of the Generals in the field, and blasted the hopes and expectations of a loyal people. Through their intrigue and imbecility the disaster under POPE and the slaughter at Antietam were brought upon us. And now the fruitless butchery on the heights of Fredericksburg is the last drop in the bitter cup of anguish and despair. A whole nation is in mourning over the awful scenes of desolation and death that come to us from the battle field, and God alone can wipe away the twenty thousand fireside tears that to-day are being shed throughout the length and breadth of this once happy country. Is there no hope for a suffering people? Must this dreadful war go on until the whole nation is in mourning? The public patience is exhausted. We see the prodigious resources of the nation exhausted, the lives of our relatives and friends inhumanly sacrificed, the voice of the people stifled, the administration deaf to the appeals of the people, and yet the end does not come.

nobody (Harper's Weekly, January 3, 1863)

MR. NOBODY, the party really responsible for the
Fredericksburg disaster.

Never was a nation or a cause more humiliated by its rulers and defenders. Incapacity, corruption and despotism rule, and the people mourn. How long, O, how long is this to endure!

          __________

The McDowell Court of Enquiry.

The McDowell Court of Enquiry has brought to light some strange revelations. – The documents put in evidence by Gen. MCDOWELL, together with Gen. MCCLELLAN’s testimony, are well calculated to open the eyes of the American people to the gigantic blunders of the authorities at Washington, who assumed the control of the campaign, thwarted and defeated the plans and operations of Gen. MCCLELLAN. The evidence vindicates MCDOWELL from any complicity in the blunders and schemes of President LINCOLN and Secretary STANTON. He, it would seem, made every effort to co-operate with MCCLELLAN in the reduction of Richmond and the defeat of the rebel army. The opprobrium and disgrace that was heaped upon MCDOWELL during the apparent idleness and inefficiency of his grand army at Fredericksburg, was undeserved, as the evidence and documents before the Court of Enquiry most clearly prove. From the letters which we publish on the first side of to-days paper, it will be seen that he most solemnly protested against the withdrawal from co-operating with MCCLELLAN in the march against Richmond. The administration alone is responsible for the inefficiency of MCDOWELL’s army, and the disaster of the Peninsula campaign, and the people should hold it a rigid account for the immense sacrifice of life and treasure which followed the footsteps of that once grand and heroic army.

The editorial fits the template of the Democrat newspaper in the Democrat Seneca County of 1862: The Republican party co-opted the Aboltionist movement for the party’s own narrow political ends; the Lincoln administration is at best incompetent; the best hope the people had to keep the country from being torn apart was General McClellan (a Democrat).

All three political cartoons are from the January 3, 1863 issue of Harper’s Weekly hosted at Son of the South. Harper’s had been more moderate and less critical of the Lincoln administration than the Seneca County paper. Fredericksburg seems to have changed that some. The first cartoon is a harsher redo of this one from sometime after Edwin Stanton became Secretary of War in January, 1862:

Cartoon showing Uncle Sam and General McClellan standing before a playbill which reads: Every day this week onward to Richmond by a select company of star generals (by Alfred R. waud, between 1861 and 1862 Winter; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-20874)

In the aftermath of the Seven Days’ battles in which the Army of the Potomac was driven back from within a few miles of Richmond Harper’s wondered, “Who Did It? and editorialized that was no one was to blame:

INEVITABLY, after such severe work as our soldiers have seen before Richmond, every body raises his head from the details, and asks, Who did it? Who is responsible for it? Who shall be the scapegoat?

We are all responsible. It is very easy, after any event has occurred, to see and to say how a different combination might have produced different results. Suppose a storm had not scattered the Spanish armada. …

The following cartoon was in the same issue and suggests that Secretary Stanton was the biggest scapegoat:

scapegoat (Harper's Weekly, July 19, 1862)

THE SCAPE-GOAT NOW ON EXHIBITION IN WASHINGTON

This contrasts with the cartoon of the backside of Lincoln from January 3, 1863: the commander-in-chief is ultimately responsible?

Lincoln understood that someone had to be accountable and eventually replaced McClellan, as he would later accept Burnside’s resignation in early 1863.

The McDowell Court of Inquiry was set up as part of the effort to assign blame for the Union defeat at Second Bull Run. It is said that McDowell “escaped culpability by testifying against Maj. Gen. Fitz John Porter” who was court-martialed for his alleged insubordination.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Battle of Fredericksburg, Lincoln Administration, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Crestfallen?

Battle of Fredericksburg, NY Times, 12-17-1862

unattainable crest

From The New-York Times December 18, 1862:

GEN. BURNSIDE’S SUNDAY DISPATCH.

The following is a copy of a dispatch from Gen. BURNSIDE to the President, sent and received on Sunday morning last, concerning the precise import and phraseology of which there has been some disputation in the newspapers:

HEADQUARTERS ARMY POTOMAC

Four o’clock A.M., 14th December.

THE PRESIDENT: I have just returned from the field. Our troops are all over the river, and hold the first ridge outside the town and three miles below. We hope to carry the crest to-day. Our loss is heavy–say five thousand. A.E. BURNSIDE,

Major-General Commanding.

Thankfully, General Burnside was dissuaded.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg, Military Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Anaconda’s coil broken – again

Uebergang über den Rappahannock (Neu Ruppin : bei Oehmigke & Riemschneider ; [between 1863 and 1870?; LOC: LC-DIG-ds-00299)

It’s German to me

Here’s some Southern rhetoric about the Confederacy’s great victory at Fredericksburg, which this editorial views as another failure of the North’s Anaconda Plan.

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 18, 1862:

Burnside’s Whereabouts.

At the time of writing this article, nothing has been heard of Burnside. …

The prisoners say the Confederates have no idea of the extent of their success. We believe it. We know that we have gained another great and glorious victory; but we believe it is far greater and far more glorious than the most sanguine among us imagine. We shall never get at the truth, for Burnside will never tell it, and we have no means of ascertaining it independently of him. Our General is not like McClellan, who always knows to an eye and a log what his enemy has lost, but can never find out what he has lost himself. But it will be Judged by its effects. It has again broken the coil of the anaconda for the fifth or sixth time. It has stopped the latest “on to Richmond.” It has demonstrated what, indeed required no farther demonstration than it had already received, that this war, pursued for an object which can never be obtained, is a sheer piece of wickedness and folly on a stupendous scale.

Officers of lst Rhode Island Volunteers - Camp Sprague, 1861 (photographed 1861, printed later; LOC: LC-USZC4-6316)

the ‘late’ Ambrose Burnside in 1861

The late Burnside.

The inhabitants of Yankeedom, having had their fill of glory over the occupation of Fredericksburg, are now doubtless prepared to felicitate themselves upon its evacuation. Next to an “onward movement,” nothing exalts them so much as a “change of base.” The first illustrates their superhuman valor; the last, their unapproachable generalship. Burnside has gratified them in both particulars. He came thundering down upon Fredericksburg like a thousand locomotives; he departed like a dog with his tail cut off. A dog with his tail cut off affords a literal exemplification of that famous Yankee operation, a change of base. The creature’s base is changed, but not his baseness. He will bite again at the first opportunity; and cutting off his tail does not improve his habits; nothing but the loss of his head will ever improve his heart.

We are curious to see what will now be the fate of Burnside. The Fredericksburg route to Richmond was his pet scheme, and in this he had the emphatic approval of the Yankee Commander in Chief, Gen. Halleck. His career has been a short one; brief and inglorious as that of the robber, Pope. The inscription upon his tombstone should be:
“If so soon he’s done for,
Wonder what he was begun for.”

The manes of McClellan are now avenged. He was decapitated for not moving; Burnside avoided that error, and behold the result. The unfortunate Yankee Generals are between Seylla and Charybdis. If they stand still their own Government destroys them; if they don’t stand still, they are destroyed by the Confederates. Burnside’s next “onward movement” may be to New Jersey, that Botuny Bay [Botony Bay] of unfortunate Federal Generals. He said he was going to [e]nd the war on the Rappahannock, but the Rappahannock has proved as intractable as the Chickahominy. Instead of ending the war, he has only put an end to himself.

A National song.

John Brown, three-quarter length portrait, facing left, holding New York Tribune (1859?; LOC: LC-USZ62-89569)

‘fanatic, a horse thief, and murderer’

It appears that the Republicans have adopted the famous “John Brown’s Soul’s a Marching On” as a national song, and no one can dispute the propriety of the selection. It is impossible to imagine anything more atrocious than the poetry except it sentiments, nor more abominable than the subject except the people. A more faithful type of the Puritan race than John Brown could not be found. A fanatic, a horse thief, and murderer, no one can dispute his claims to be the patron saint of the rogues and ruffians who are “marching on.” stealing and butchering as they go.

The French have the “Marsellaise,” the Britons “God Save the Queen,” the United States once had “Hail Columbia,” and the Yankees “Yankee Doodle”–an appropriate air for them in their days of simplicity — but “John Brown” is the melody of all others suited to their course and full-blown depravity. It is redolent of all the peculiar characteristics of that peculiar people. The horse thief, murderer, and insurrectionist, was the true representative of the spirit and character of this whole invasion, and his ignominious end of the destiny which awaits it.

“It has again broken the coil of the anaconda for the fifth or sixth time.” That might be one way to sum up the war because the blustering, blundering Yankees had the resources (and enough political will) to keep on squeezing. “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” probably did help keep up a persevering spirit in a part of the Northern public.

The_Battle_Hymn_of_the_Republic_-_Project_Gutenberg_eText_21566

inspiring the ‘rogues and ruffians” to keep on marching

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Need to know

A Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1862 reprinted more feedback on the Union debacle at Fredericksburg. Facts, speculation, opinion, and politics all seem to be mixed together as the northern press was trying to get to the bottom of what happened:

The Losses at Fredericksburg.

Halt of Wilcox's Troops in Caroline street prevous[sic] to going in to battle-- (by Arthur Lumley, New York Illustrated News, 10 January, 1863, p. 148; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-20791)

well, usually well-organized

Four days have elapsed since the fight at Fredericksburg and the country is kept in painful suspense with regard to the loss of the federal army. It is even given out in a dispatch from Washington that the figures cannot be definitely ascertained for several days to come.There is really no obstacle in the way of giving within a day or two of an engagement such as that of Saturday, a complete report of the killed, wounded and missing. The organization of an army like that under Burnside is so perfect that in a few hours after being required full reports might be obtained from every regiment and division of troops. Gen. Burnside probably has the reports – for he must know the condition of his army to act understandingly – and it is likely that they are kept back from the public by the strategists of the war office who are so inscrutably wise in all their movements. – Rochester Union.

     _________

A Washington correspondent wrote us, Monday night –

“OUR LOSSES ARE 20,000.”

We did not credit him, and, in an excess of prudence, threw his manuscript aside, – but we fear he was too near the truth.

A letter, we copy from an edition of the Tribune, puts down – Loss.

                                                         Couch’s Corps ………………….10,000
                        Reynolds’ Corps of Franklin’s Division …………….4,000

These do not include Wilcox’s Corps, or Hooker’s Grand Division.

Hooker went in last, and suffered least – but his losses must have been great. – N.Y. Express.

     __________

President elect, Abraham Lincoln Portrait of Abraham Lincoln, President Elect of the United States of America, with scenes and incidents in his life -- phot. by P. Butler, Springfield, Ill. (Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, v. 11 (1861 March 9), pp. 248-49;LOC: LC-USZ62-6868 )

Barnacle Abe, the failer?

The New York Express in view of the overwhelming defeat of the Federal army, and the terrible slaughter which followed, says, “it is evident, now, – either the Administration must die, or the Government must die. The Administration and the Government can no longer live together. One or the other must perish. Which shall it be? Never, never, the Government. – long live the Government! – and, oh, ye Republicans – responsible for this Administration – change or abolish your Administration. As Mr. Lincoln must be kept – the Barnacle of the Constitution – let Republican Congressmen create for him an able, discreet Adminisration.

     _________

The New York World in speaking of the battle of Fredicksburg says positively that [Gen.?] Burnside acted under strict orders; he was compelled to move upon Fredericksburg by preamptory directions from Washington, which domineered over his judgment and extorted his obedience. When he was ordered to Fredericksburg he had the promise of Gen. Halleck that his pontoons should meet him there. Gen. Halleck forgot to give the order! – and they were delayed so long that the enemy occupied the heights. In this emergency a council of war was held; all the corps commanders opposed an advance; but Burnside said, in conclusion, that he was compelled to advance by orders from Washington.”

     _________

rastus Brooks, head-and-shoulders portrait, three-quarters to the right (between 1844 and 1860; LOC: LC-USZ62-109972)

inquiring mind from NY Express

HON. ERASTUS BROOKS writes the New york Express from Washington that the battle at and near Fredericksburg was fought by the President of the United States and by Gen. Halleck, (by the latter especially), against the judgment and remonstrance of General Burnside and of General Sumner, and perhaps of other officers associated with them, in command of the Army. These two names are given, – and the facts can all be furnished to Congress, if an inquiry is ordered. This inquiry ought to be pressed at once for several important reasons.

Erastus Brooks was born in 1815 in the Maine District of Massachusetts (Portland). He was a New York politician and worked as a journalist in New York and Maine, including a stint editing the Portland Advertiser, a Whig paper.

At it turned out, total Union casualties were about 12,600 dead, wounded, prisoners, and missing.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Military Matters, Northern Politics During War | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Doing the Dirgey Work

Gallant Charge of Humphrey's Division at the Battle of Fredericksburg (by  Alfred R. Waud, Harper's Weekly, January 10, 1863, p. 24-25; LOC:  LC-DIG-ppmsca-22479 )

gallant and futile charge

150 years ago today citizens in the Confederate capital were getting more news of the Battle of Fredericksburg and starting to make more sense of their victory and their losses. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 15, 1862:

From Fredericksburg.
Great fight on Saturday.
the enemy repulsed at all points.
&c., &c., &c., &c.

Great anxiety prevailed in the community on Saturday, to hear further and more satisfactory reports from the seat of war, as precious rumors had induced the supposition that a general and decisive engagement was imminent; but no intelligence of a reliable character could be obtained until 9 o’clock P. M., at which hour the following dispatches were received at the War Department by General Cooper.

Gen. Robt. E. Lee at Fredericksburg, Dec. 13, 1862 (by Henry Alexander Ogden, c1900; LOC: LC-USZC4-1976 )

‘the enemy being repulsed at all points. Thanks be to God!”

To General Cooper:

At 9 o’clock this morning the enemy attacked our right wing, and as the fog lifted the battle ran along the whole line from right to left until 6 P. M., the enemy being repulsed at all points. Thanks be to God!

As usual, we have to mourn the loss of many of our brave men.

I [ expect ] the battle will be renewed at daylight to-morrow morning.

R. E. Lee.

The highly gratifying nature of these dispatches only increased the general desire to learn something further, and throughout the day the bulletin boards in front of the various newspaper offices were surrounded by eager crowds in search of later intelligence. The War office was also besieged by anxious inquirers, but nothing of an official character was disclosed.

Cobb's and Kershaw's troops behind the stone wall (by Allen Christian redwood, c1894; LOC: LC-USZ62-134479)

repulsing the Yankees with ‘terrible slaughter’

A telegraphic dispatch was received at the office of the Provost Marshal at 7 o’clock last night, stating that five ambulance trains were then between Hanover Junction and Guinea Station on their route to Richmond. Up to the hour of 12 o’clock P. M. none of the trains had arrived, though a large number of ambulances and backs were still awaiting them to convey the wounded to Seabrook’s Hospital. …

A soldier of A. P. Hill’s division says the enemy charged our men in their rifle pits and entrenchments nine times, and were repulsed with terrible slaughter, until our ammunition gave out, when our men were again charged in overwhelming force and driven back. But having obtained more ammunition, our forces in their turn charged the enemy and drove them from the works in great disorder, taking a large number of prisoners. …

Gen. Cobb was killed. Gen. Hood is also reported killed, but the rumor lacks confirmation. Gen. Gregg was mortally wounded.

Arrival of bodies.

The 5 o’clock train yesterday afternoon brought down the bodies of several officers. Among them were those of Brig.-Gen. Thos. R. R. Cobb, of Ga., and Capt. D’Aquin, of the Louisiana Guard Artillery.

Gen. T.R.R. Cobb (no date recorded on caption card; LOC: LC-USZ62-80578)

Thomas R. R. Cobb

Thomas Reade Rootes Cobb was “an American lawyer, author, politician, and Confederate officer …” Before the war he was well-known for his Inquiry into the Law of Negro Slavery in the United States (1858), which was

[t]he only legal defense of slavery produced by a southerner, Cobb’s treatise covered a vast range of arguments, from historical precedent and property rights to black inferiority.

Despite his arguments that the concept of slavery was good and formed the foundation of all great civilizations, Cobb deemed only African slavery to be acceptable in practice because he believed that God intended for blacks to be inferior to whites. Enslavement allowed white Christian masters to “improve” their slaves.

In his introduction to this book Cobb traces slavery back to Genesis and notes that the slave trade is at least as old as Joseph’s sale to merchants from Midian, who then sold him to Egypt.
___________________________________________________

Gen. Burndside [sic] visiting Gn. Franklin giving him the order to evacuate his position-on the battlefield on the right, Sunday Eve., all at rest (by Arthur Lumley, 1862 ca. December 14; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-20776 )

deciding to recross the Rappahannock

150 years ago tonight the Union army moved back from Fredericksburg to the Falmouth side of the Rappahannock. From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1862:

Our Army Retreats.

The Army of the Potomac evacuated their position on Monday night, and re-crossed the Rappahannock. The movement was a perilous one, but it was conducted in safety. The storm and the darkness of the night prevented the enemy from obtaining knowledge of our movement. The pontoon bridges were removed, thus cutting off all communication between the two shores. It is stated that our wounded are all safe on this side of the river.

Battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Dec 13th 1862 (Currier & Ives, 1862; LOC: LC-USZC4-3365)

butchered

A correspondent of the Tribune in describing the struggle on Saturday says, “it is not too strong an expression to say that in this battle we were butchered.” He says General French went into the action with 7,000 men. To-night, two days after the battle, but 1,200 men have reported to him!

The entire loss in the corps of Gen. Couch, consisting of the divisions of Gens. Howard, French, and Hancock, and which on the morning of the battle contained 40 regiments, old and new, amounting to at least 20,000, is about 10,000!

I think the official reports will not vary from this estimate more than 500 above or below the number.

Gen. D.N. Couch, U.S.A. (between 1860 and 1865; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpbh-03196)

his corps chewed up

The losses in Gen. Reynolds’ corps of Franklin’s grand division, which were at first supposed to be but two thousand are to night considered by some of Franklin’s staff officers nearly 4,000.

The same correspondent places the total loss at 13,500. The slaughter is described as terrible, and the disaster more humiliating than any that has befell us during the war.

Darius Nash Couch watched much of the action on December 13th from the cupola of Fredericksburg’s courthouse. Observing the repulse of French’s troops Couch reportedly said, it was “as if the division had simply vanished.”

The signal telegraph train as used at the battle of Fredericksburg (by Alfred R. Waud, Harper's Weekly, January 24, 1863, p. 53; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-21453)

Bad News: Union signal telegraph on December 13, 1862

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg, Military Matters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Localized Tally

Plan of the Battle of Fredericksburg, Va., Decr. 13, 1862 by Robert Knox Sneden (LOC: gvhs01 vhs00123 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.ndlpcoop/gvhs01.vhs00123)
150 years ago today Federal and Confederate generals were deciding their next steps in the aftermath of the December 13th slaughter at Fredericksburg, news of which would start making its way back to the public(s) at large.

Here’s a couple stories from Seneca County, New York newspapers from December, 1862. The first article relates to the December 11th Union construction of pontoon bridges across the Rappahannock:

Wounded at Fredericksburg.

Building pontoon bridges at Fredericksburg Dec. 11th. ([1862] December 11, by Alfred R. Waud; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-21209)

The 50th NY Engineers at work December 11, 1862

The telegraph in giving an account of the operations of the Engineer Corps, in throwing pontoon bridges across the Rappahannock furnishes a list of those killed and wounded by the rebels in this hazardous undertaking. Among the number was was the name of Capt. JAMES H. MCDONALD, of this village attached to Stuart’s Engineer Regiment. He was wounded in the arm though not seriously, as we are glad to learn. In a letter to his wife, dated Fredericksburg, Dec. 12th, he says: “yesterday morning about half-past five o’clock, while taking my men on to a pontoon bridge that we were constructing for the second time in the face of the enemy’s fire, I received a rifle ball through my elbow. – It is not serious so far as I can learn from the doctors. Yours, very tired,

JAS. H. MCDONALD

P.S. – Sterling Wickes slightly wounded. Capt. Perkins, that you saw, is killed. Capt. Brainard and myself are the only officers wounded. Lost thirty men.”

Capt. PERKINS is from Geneva, and was shot through the head. STERLING WICKES is a resident of this place.

You can read a good account of the December 11th action at The Civil War 150th Blog.

George Dashiell Bayard, Union General

George Dashiell Bayard

The most prominent officer killed at the battle of Fredericksburg was Brig. Gen. GEORGE D. BAYARD, one of the most gallant cavalry officers of the regular army. He was a native of this village, and a son of SAMUEL BAYARD. He graduated at West Point in 1856. In 1861 he was promoted to a captaincy of the Fourth United States Cavalry and soon made Brigadier General. Gen. BAYARD was a gallant and meritorious officer.

An article about George D. Bayard by David Lay at The Bivouac includes the following:

Brigadier-General Bayard commanded cavalry brigades in the Department of the Rappahannock, Mountain Department, Army of Virginia, and Army of the Potomac. Bayard and his Cavalry Brigade opened the Battle of Fredericksburg on December 13, 1862, holding the Rebels until the Federal infantry could be positioned. He was struck in the hip by a shell fragment later that afternoon while at Major-General Franklin’s headquarters in a grove of trees near Fredericksburg, and died the following day, within days of his pending marriage. General Franklin reported of Bayard “the loss of this gallant young general is a severe blow to his arm of the service, and in him the country has lost one of its most dashing and gallant cavalry officers”.

A Battle As Seen By The Reserve by Thomas Nast (Harper's Weekly,  December 27, 1862)

Dead and Wounded at a generic battlefield

This image by Thomas Nast is hosted at Son of the South. The same December 27, 1862 issue of Harper’s Weekly includes Nast’s description of the scene.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg, Military Matters | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“beautiful and sharp fighting”

Fredericksburg-Overview (by Hal Jespersen)

33rd NY supported batteries in W.F. Smith’s Corps

150 years ago today a great Union blood bath occurred at the Battle of Fredericksburg. Belonging to W.F. Smith’s XI Corps, the 33rd New York Infantry Regiment supported artillery in William Franklin’s Left Grand Division. A quick recap of the battle: Franklin’s grand division failed to exploit a temporary breakthrough by troops under Gordon Meade. The Union right futilely tried many times throughout the day to dislodge Confederates concentrated behind a stone wall on Marye’s Heights.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in 1862:

Letter from Capt. Tyler.

The following letter was written by Capt. E.J. Tyler, the second day after the battle of Fredericksburg. It is dated Dec. 15th, and addressed to his father:

We have been to the front for two days, most of the time supporting the batteries, and under a fierce fire of artillery. Our Brigadier-General (Vinton) is severely if not fatally wounded, and the Brigade is now under Gen. Neil. The 33d is fortunate, as usual, in slight loss. The Brigade I think will lose lightly; but as a whole, there has been some beautiful and sharp fighting as I ever saw. We have driven them back from the river about two miles, into their fortified position, and they are yet fighting like the very devil. We tried them with our best troops for two days, and our men fought desperately and none ever fought better, but still they hold most of their line of defences. Our loss much be much greater than theirs for they fought most of the time under some sort of cover.

Our division was relieved this morning before daylight, and are now in the rear to get a little rest, which gives me his opportunity to say all right with me, and none seriously hurt in the company thus far.

The weather has moderated and is much warmer, and snow has disappeared.

Hastily, E.J. TYLER.

At Fredericksburg on December 13, 1862 Francis Laurens Vinton “…was severely wounded while leading his regiment in a gallant charge. Disabled by his wound for many months, and incapacitated for further service, he resigned from the Army in May, 1863.”

Edwin J. Tyler

Our correspondent took Captain Guion’s place

Here’s an excerpt from The story of the Thirty-third N.Y.S. vols.; or, two years campaigning in Virginia and Maryland (by David W. Judd (page 248)) that describes the 33rd’s experience during the battle:

Instead of being posted some distance to the rear Colonel Taylor was ordered close up to the guns and the men lay almost beneath the caissons. Shot and shell were whizzing, screaming, crashing, and moaning all around them, but they manfully maintained their position, receiving the fire directed upon the artillerists. Towards noon a 64-pounder opened from the hill directly back of Fredericksburg. The first shell struck a few feet in front of the Regiment, the second fell directly in their midst, plunging into the ground to the depth of three feet or more. The enemy had obtained most perfect range, and would have inflicted a great loss of life, had not the monster gun very fortunately for us exploded on the third discharge. The guns which the Thirty third supported were repeatedly hit by the enemy, whose batteries could be distinctly seen glistening in the edge of the woods a mile distant.

One round shot struck the wheel of a caisson, smashing it to atoms, and prostrating the “powder boy,” who was taking ammunition from it at the time. Had the missile gone ten inches further to the left, it must have exploded the caisson and caused fearful havoc among the Thirty-third. Here Colonel Taylor lay with his men for many long hours, exposed to the fury of the rebel cannoniers, without shelter or protection of any kind, until the after part of the day, when they were relieved by the Forty-third New York Col Baker and fell back to the second line of battle. …

Fred12131862 (by Robert Knox Sneden; gvhs01 vhs00221 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.ndlpcoop/gvhs01.vhs00221 )

map with casualties

"Gallant Charge of Humphrey's Division at the Battle of Fredericksburg." (by Alfred R. Waud, Harper's Weekly, January 10, 1863 p24)

Storming Marye’s Heights on Union Right

This image was published in the January 10, 1863 issue of Harper’s Weekly and is hosted at Son of the South. Hal Jespersen’s map at the top is licensed by Creative Commons.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg, Military Matters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Richmond is ours!

Presidential Prophecy?

Abraham Lincoln, U.S. President. Seated portrait, holding glasses and newspaper, Aug. 9, 1863 (by Alexander Gardner, Washington, D.C., 1863, printed later; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-19206)

1863: rose-colored spectacles removed

From The New-York Times December 13, 1862:

NEWS FROM WASHINGTON.; What the President Says About Affairs at Fredericksburgh. …

WASHINGTON, Friday, Dec. 12.

WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAYS.

Upon receiving the news from Fredericksburgh last evening, the President is said to have remarked, ” The rebellion is now virtually at an end,” and to have added a prophesy that Richmond would be in possession of the Union troops before the first of January.

ANXIETY FOR THE NEWS.

The city to-day has been in a state of feverish anxiety for news from Fredericksburgh. This feeling increased towards night, in consequence of the [???] of the Government, and rumors put [???] circulation by secesh sympathizers, of successes by the rebels, and evening closed without bringing relief to the minds of the people generally, as nothing positive transpired till a very late hour. Citizens of New-York City go to bed, to-night, generally as well informed of to-day’s operations as those of Washington, and the dispatches sent to the TIMES to-night will give them, to-morrow morning, a clearer knowledge of the situation than the public here can be expected to possess. As we close there is general evidence that all is well with our army, and every indication of stirring and decisive events to-morrow. …

That kind of extreme over-confidence doesn’t sound too much like Abe Lincoln to me; he seems much more realistic in this message to Fernando Wood from 150 years ago today (at Project Gutenberg):

TO FERNANDO WOOD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON DECEMBER 12, 1862.

HON. FERNANDO WOOD.

MY DEAR SIR:—Your letter of the 8th, with the accompanying note of same date, was received yesterday. The most important paragraph in the letter, as I consider, is in these words:

“On the 25th of November last I was advised by an authority which I deemed likely to be well informed, as well as reliable and truthful, that the Southern States would send representatives to the next Congress, provided that a full and general amnesty should permit them to do so. No guarantee or terms were asked for other than the amnesty referred to.”

I strongly suspect your information will prove to be groundless; nevertheless, I thank you for communicating it to me. Understanding the phrase in the paragraph just quoted—”the Southern States would send representatives to the next Congress”—to be substantially the same as that “the people of the Southern States would cease resistance, and would reinaugurate, submit to, and maintain the national authority within the limits of such States, under the Constitution of the United States,” I say that in such case the war would cease on the part of the United States; and that if within a reasonable time “a full and general amnesty” were necessary to such end, it would not be withheld.

I do not think it would be proper now to communicate this, formally or informally, to the people of the Southern States. My belief is that they already know it; and when they choose, if ever, they can communicate with me unequivocally. Nor do I think it proper now to suspend military operations to try any experiment of negotiation.

I should nevertheless receive with great pleasure the exact information you now have, and also such other as you may in any way obtain. Such information might be more valuable before the 1st of January than afterwards.

While there is nothing in this letter which I shall dread to see in history, it is, perhaps, better for the present that its existence should not become public. I therefore have to request that you will regard it as confidential.

Your obedient servant,
A. LINCOLN.

Back to Fredericksburg

As Union troops crossed the Rappahannock 150 years ago today they pillaged the city of Fredericksburg. According to Shelby Foote [1] as the federals were having their fun in the old colonial town, they began to wonder why the Confederates were not putting up any resistance. Some thought it was because they were out of artillery shells or General Lee was trying to influence Europeon opinion by contrasting the Yankee barbarity with Southern restraint. “Still another, a veteran private, had a different idea. ‘Shit’, he said. ‘They want us to get in. Getting out won’t be so smart or easy. You’ll see.'”

Night. The sacking of Fredericksburg-- & biovace[sic]of Union troops (by Arthur Lumley, 1862 December 12; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-20787)

marauders’ row

  1. [1]The Civil War: A Narrative, Volume II Fredericksburg to Meridian (New York: Vintage Books, 1986), 30.
Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg, Military Matters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Why They Moved Hospital

Building pontoon bridges at Fredericksburg Dec. 11th. (By Alfred R. Waud; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-21209)

trying to bridge the Rappahannock

150 years ago today General Burnside’s Union Army of the Potomac tried to cross the Rappahannock to attack General Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia in the vicinity of Fredericksburg. You can read a good account at Civil War Daily Gazette. Here’s a letter home from a member of the 50th New York Engineers, one of the regiments tasked with constructing the pontoon bridges.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1862:

From S.W.E. VIELE.

CAMP AT FALMOUTH STATION, FREDERICKSBURG, Va.

Tuesday, Dec. 16, 1862.

DEAR PARENTS. – You have no doubt received my letter of last Thursday, and that told you that the battle of Fredericksburg had began. If you have not received that you have certainly heard of this battle through the papers. So considering all things I will write only the personal not the general particulars.

Last Wednesday morning myself and four others were ordered to move the hospital from White Oak Church to Falmouth Station; why, we knew not.

We did not go back to camp till nearly 12 o’clock that night, when we found all the boys gone with the pontoon boats, except a few left as guards, then we knew why we had moved the hospital to Falmouth, but little did we dream how soon it was to be used. – In the morning at 4 o’clock, we were aroused by the roar of cannon, and the continuous discharge of rifles. Soon the wounded and stragglers began to arrive in camp, when we received the news of our Captain’s death and other wounded. At that I sat down and wrote to you to let you know that I was all safe and sound as yet, and then started for the battle ground at Falmouth, distant 5 miles. Mother, you will say I did wrong in thus voluntarily exposing myself, but I could not stay at camp incurring risk, and think that my companions in arms were risking life and limb.

I first went to the hospital and saw my beloved Captain Perkins, and found that a ball had struck him in the side of the neck glancing down into the shoulder, killing him at once. He only said: “Boys take care of yourselves,” and died. his body has been sent home. Then I went to the bridge; there were six companies to lay three bridges. – Co.’s I,A,C,, and G, laid two bridges side by side. Co.’s K and F laid their bridge at the lower end of the town, while we laid our bridge at the upper end of the town, and the whole 15th reg.,, and a company of regular engineers managed to lay two bridges several miles below out of all danger. Our companies got their bridge half way across when a whole regiment of Sharpshooters opened fire on each bridge. The river here is about 20 rods wide, and the enemy were on a bank about as high as the American House hill. – The first round they fired was too low, and struck the water. The second volley went over their heads – this volley killed our Captain; then the order was given to fall back, which was obeyed with a will.

Attack on Fredericksburg (by Alonzo Chappel, December 1862; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-22752)

“the boys charged up the bank on a run, firing as they went”

Nothing more was done until 2 P.M., when the artillery opened on the town, and such a continuous rain of shot and shell for over an hour, but few towns ever received. This drove most of the enemy beyond the town. The town lies very much like Waterloo, stretching along the river like the north half, and it is about the size of Geneva. – When the artillery quit firing, our boys volunteered to take some soldiers across in boats before beginning work on the bridge. Some of the 51st N.Y., and 7th Michigan volunteered to go. They went all safe until over half way across, when some Sharpshooters concealed in rifle pits fired on them, but nothing could stop those boys from crossing. Just as the boat touched the bank, they received another volley, killing the best man in Co. I, named Camplain; he was from Oswego. On seeing him fall, the boys charged up the bank on a run, firing as they went. Martin Mathews was one of the first to touch the other shore, and took the first prisoner taken in Fredericksburg. As soon as the others landed we went to work at the bridge and rushed it across “right smart;” then the troops crossed as fast as possible, and soon had possession of the town, the rebels falling back to their entrenchments on a hill behind the town. As soon as we had laid the bridge I went up into the town to see how things looked – and such a sight! dead Rebels lying in the street and houses, killed by the artillery, and you cannot imagine how they were cut and torn to pieces. I picked up a good English Enfield Rifle.

The loss of our Regiment was eight killed and 40 or 50 wounded, including Captain Perkins killed, Captain McDonaldwounded in the left arm quite badly, but will not lose his arm, and one other Captain wounded in the arm.

The whole loss on the Union side was 100 killed; the Rebel loss 1,000, that is, in laying the bridge; that was Thursday. Saturday the great battle of Fredericksburg was fought and Gen. Burnside fell back under cover of the town, and the night of the 15th his whole army recrossed the river.

The weather is warm daytime, and at night freezes a very little, but we have blankets enough to keep warm and comfortable.

Your son,

EDWARDS.

A New-York Times correspondent covered the events of the entire day. It’s a very thorough article; I’m just showing a bit of the beginning and the end.

From The New-York Times December 13, 1862:

THE OPERATIONS OF THURSDAY.; Fall Particulars from Our Special Correspondent.

FREDERICKSBURGH, Va., Thursday Night, Dec. 11.

Street in Fredericksburg, Va., showing houses destroyed by bombardment in December, 1862 (photographed 1862, [printed between 1880 and 1889]; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-32890)

‘“living” Fredericksburgh “no more.” A city soulless …’

I localize this letter Fredericksburgh, but it is assuredly “living” Fredericksburgh “no more.” A city soulless, rent by wrack of war, and shooting up in flames athwart night’s sky, is the pretty little antique spot by the Rappahannock, erewhite [erstwhile] the peculiar scene of dignified case and retirement. …

Although we are not yet fully informed of the present positions of the enemy, there seems to be good ground to claim that Gen. BURNSIDE has succeeded in outgeneraling and outwitting them. His decoys to make them believe that we were about to cross our main force at Port Conway, seem to have succeeded admirably. I suppose there is no harm now in my mentioning that among the ruses he employed was sending down, day before .yesterday, to Port Conway, three hundred wagons, and bringing them back by a different road, for the sole purpose of making the rebels believe that we were about to cross the river at that point. To the same end, workmen were busily employed in laying causeways for supposed pontoon bridges there, while the gunboats were held as bugaboos at the same place. Completely deceived by these feints, the main rebel force, including JACKSON’s command, seems to have been two or three days ago transferred twenty or twenty-five miles down the river. It must be remembered, however, that without the utmost celerity on our part they can readily retrieve this blunder by a forced march or two. Signal gun, at 6 o’clock this morning, gave them the cue to what was going on, and doubtless they have not been idle during the intervening hours. To-morrow will disclose what unseen moves have been made on the chess-board. W.S.

An editorial lauding the volunteers who drove the rebel snipers out of town from The New-York Times December 14, 1862:

HONORS TO HEROES.–

Every one who read the [???] account given by our Virginia correspondent, yesterday, of the unsurpassed coolness and valor displayed by the “forlorn hope” of 400 men, who crossed the Rappahannock in small boats, in face of the fire of the rebel sharpshooters, and drove them pellmell through Fredericksburgh, must have felt that these were heroes who, indeed, merited the recognition of their country. From the moment that the men of the Seventh Michigan sprang from their crouching places behind the rocks on the north bank of the river, and rushing for the pontoon boats, pushed them into the water, and leapt into them, all the time under the enemy’s fire — through that solemn scene when the first boat-load of gallant fellows pushed off amid the crack! crack! of a hundred rebel rifles, followed quickly by another and another boat-load, up to the moment when, rushing from their boats, amid the applauding shouts of our army which was watching them, they swept up the hill, on the further side of the river, and, musket in hand, fell upon the skulking rebels and killed, captured, or chased them all from their lurking places — everything through the whole affair was as fine as ever was anything in military history.

“It was,” said our correspondent, “an authentic piece of human heroism which moves men as nothing else can.” And as to its effect, he added: “The problem (of our army crossing the river) was now solved. This flash of bravery has done what scores of batteries and tons of metal had failed to accomplish. The country,” continued our correspondent, “will not forget that little band.” We hope the country will not forget them. Had these men been under NAPOLEON, their valor would have been signalized and honored on the spot; had they been in any European service, they would have received such token of recognition as would have filled them with pride for life, and been an heirloom for posterity; had they even been on the enemy’s side, they would have won the “cross” which the rebels give to their bravest. In our army, and on our side, we fear that all the recognition and reward these men will ever receive for their day’s service, will be to be kept waiting half a year or more for the forty cents they earned by it. It is a shame. If there can be no other reward, they certainly deserve the thanks of Congress as much as some of the big Generals who have received them. They would thus have their names enrolled on the national record as having at least deserved well of their country.

"The forlorn hope" - volunteer storming party, consisting of portions of the 7th Michigan and 19th Massachusetts, crossing the Rappahannock in advance of the Grand Army, to drive off the Rebel riflemen, who were firing upon the Union pontoniers, Wednesday, December 10 (by Henri Lovie, Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, 1862 Dec. 27, pp. 216-217; LOC: LC-USZ62-119620)

“The forlorn hope”

50th New York Engineers in Lead Story

Edward Viele

Our Correspondent

Augustus Perkins

Viele’s beloved captain

Hanson Champlin

best man in Company I

Martin Matthews

took a rebel as prisoner

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Battle of Fredericksburg, Military Matters | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment